Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Gitleaks to a Weekly Scan #119

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tylertitsworth
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Because Gitleaks doesn't support pull request target event, we should move it to a regular time since it already runs as part of super-linter in PRs.

Related Issue

n/a

Changes Made

  • The code follows the project's coding standards.
  • No Intel Internal IP is present within the changes.
  • The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes in functionality.

Validation

n/a

  • I have tested any changes in container groups locally with test_runner.py with all existing tests passing, and I have added new tests where applicable.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 1 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

.github/workflows/weekly-test.yaml

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
gitleaks/gitleaks-action44c470ffc35caa8b1eb3e8012ca53c2f9bea4eb5NullUnknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
actions/gitleaks/gitleaks-action 44c470ffc35caa8b1eb3e8012ca53c2f9bea4eb5 🟢 4.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Maintained🟢 97 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 9license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
actions/actions/checkout a5ac7e51b41094c92402da3b24376905380afc29 🟢 7.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1016 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 4dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Vulnerabilities🟢 91 existing vulnerabilities detected
actions/gitleaks/gitleaks-action 44c470ffc35caa8b1eb3e8012ca53c2f9bea4eb5 🟢 4.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Maintained🟢 97 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 9license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
actions/step-security/harden-runner 17d0e2bd7d51742c71671bd19fa12bdc9d40a3d6 🟢 8.8
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
CI-Tests🟢 1015 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Contributors🟢 62 different organizations found -- score normalized to 6
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Maintained🟢 1017 commit(s) out of 30 and 2 issue activity out of 30 found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1no published package detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 7dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Vulnerabilities🟢 10no vulnerabilities detected

Scanned Manifest Files

.github/workflows/weekly-test.yaml
.github/workflows/gitleaks.yaml

@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth changed the title move gitleaks to weekly Move Gitleaks to a Weekly Scan Jun 11, 2024
@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth enabled auto-merge June 11, 2024 15:52
Copy link
Contributor

@sharvil10 sharvil10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8354255 Jun 11, 2024
9 checks passed
@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth deleted the tylertitsworth/gitleaks-weekly branch June 11, 2024 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants