Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure aggregation control is optional #551

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2023

Conversation

mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator

@mgrover1 mgrover1 commented Dec 5, 2022

Change Summary

Makes aggregation control optional, matching the catalog spec docs

Related issue number

Closes #549

Checklist

  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Tests pass on CI
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable

@andersy005
Copy link
Member

@mgrover1, thank you for this fix. do you mind adding a unit test?

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mgrover1 commented Dec 5, 2022

You betcha!

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mgrover1 commented Dec 5, 2022

@mgrover1, thank you for this fix. do you mind adding a unit test?

Done!

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mgrover1 commented Dec 5, 2022

I am not sure why read the docs is failing here

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@andersy005 - do you think the error here could be caused by the long run time? RTD is saying it took 363 seconds (60 minutes)

Copy link
Member

@andersy005 andersy005 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks solid to me 👍🏽. thank you, @mgrover1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

aggregation_control is documented as optional but coded as mandatory in pydantic model
2 participants