Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency eslint to v8.21.0 #363

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2022
Merged

Update dependency eslint to v8.21.0 #363

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 1, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) 8.20.0 -> 8.21.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint

v8.21.0

Compare Source

Features
  • 7b43ea1 feat: Implement FlatESLint (#​16149) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • 92bf49a feat: improve the key width calculation in key-spacing rule (#​16154) (Nitin Kumar)
  • c461542 feat: add new allowLineSeparatedGroups option to the sort-keys rule (#​16138) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 1cdcbca feat: add deprecation warnings for legacy API in RuleTester (#​16063) (Nitin Kumar)
Bug Fixes
  • 0396775 fix: lines-around-comment apply allowBlockStart for switch statements (#​16153) (Nitin Kumar)
Documentation
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@renovate renovate bot merged commit 6847872 into main Aug 1, 2022
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/eslint branch August 1, 2022 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants