-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closes #588 - Added span error status #614
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't had a detailed look on the tests but they will be fine I guess :)
Reviewed 6 of 8 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 6 of 8 files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @JonasKunz)
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHookGenerator.java, line 151 at r1 (raw file):
isBlank
You can also use isNotBlank
instead of the negation.
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHookGenerator.java, line 153 at r1 (raw file):
isBlank
Here as well: isNotBlank
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 17 at r1 (raw file):
*/ @AllArgsConstructor public class SetSpanStatusAction implements IHookAction {
Can you add a unit test for some small tests, e.g. if a span has been entered or not
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 28 at r1 (raw file):
enteredSpan
Maybe a bit out of scope here, but can we name this method hasEnteredSpan
. I was confused why we are entering a span here, because I dind't read that it was entered
.
Imo it is always nice when boolean method are starting with is
or has
. What do you think?
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 30 at r1 (raw file):
if (ctx.enteredSpan()) { Object statusValue = errorStatus.get(context); if (statusValue != null && !Boolean.FALSE.equals(statusValue)) {
You could remove the null check.
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 43 at r1 (raw file):
@Override public String getName() { return "Set Span Status";
We have different "styles" of naming the existing span actions, e.g.:
- StoreSpanAction - >
Span storing
- SetSpanStatusAction ->
Span Attribute Writing
- SetSpanStatusAction ->
Set Span Status
Can you unify them and chose a common style?
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/config/MethodHookConfigurationResolverTest.java, line 164 at r1 (raw file):
.hasSize(2) .containsEntry("attr", "dataX") .containsEntry("attr2", "dataY");
Shouldn't this also contain an error
tag?
inspectit-ocelot-documentation/docs/instrumentation/rules.md, line 490 at r1 (raw file):
> The name must exist at the end of the entry section and cannot be set in the exit section. #### Trace Sampling
Nice! Additional headlines makes it much easier to read!
inspectit-ocelot-documentation/docs/instrumentation/rules.md, line 541 at r1 (raw file):
:
, of a rule's tracing section.
inspectit-ocelot-documentation/docs/instrumentation/rules.md, line 553 at r1 (raw file):
of `error-status` can
of the error-status
property can...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 3 of 14 files reviewed, 7 unresolved discussions (waiting on @mariusoe)
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHookGenerator.java, line 151 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
isBlank
You can also use
isNotBlank
instead of the negation.
Done.
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHookGenerator.java, line 153 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
isBlank
Here as well:
isNotBlank
Done.
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 17 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
Can you add a unit test for some small tests, e.g. if a span has been entered or not
Done.
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 28 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
enteredSpan
Maybe a bit out of scope here, but can we name this method
hasEnteredSpan
. I was confused why we are entering a span here, because I dind't read that it wasentered
.
Imo it is always nice when boolean method are starting withis
orhas
. What do you think?
Agreed
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 30 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
You could remove the null check.
I think you missed the negation in the equals
check there.
If I removed the null
check, a value of null
would result in the span being marked as error
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 43 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
We have different "styles" of naming the existing span actions, e.g.:
- StoreSpanAction - >
Span storing
- SetSpanStatusAction ->
Span Attribute Writing
- SetSpanStatusAction ->
Set Span Status
Can you unify them and chose a common style?
Done.
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/config/MethodHookConfigurationResolverTest.java, line 164 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
Shouldn't this also contain an
error
tag?
This is the test for the configuration resolver, not for the span action.
E.g. we verify the hook build plan, not the attributes geenrated at runtime.
inspectit-ocelot-documentation/docs/instrumentation/rules.md, line 553 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, mariusoe (Marius Oehler) wrote…
of `error-status` can
of the
error-status
property can...
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 8 files at r1, 9 of 9 files at r2.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @JonasKunz and @mariusoe)
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/main/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusAction.java, line 30 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, JonasKunz (Jonas Kunz) wrote…
I think you missed the negation in the
equals
check there.
If I removed thenull
check, a value ofnull
would result in the span being marked as error
Yeah, I think I saw that later and I thought I removed this comment again :)
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/actions/span/SetSpanStatusActionTest.java, line 67 at r2 (raw file):
void throwableStatus() { SetSpanStatusAction action = new SetSpanStatusAction((ctx) -> new Throwable()); doReturn(true).when(ctx).hasEnteredSpan();
Can you add the same test, with hasEntered
false
? Then there should be zero interaction with the span, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 12 of 14 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @mariusoe)
inspectit-ocelot-core/src/test/java/rocks/inspectit/ocelot/core/instrumentation/config/MethodHookConfigurationResolverTest.java, line 164 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, JonasKunz (Jonas Kunz) wrote…
This is the test for the configuration resolver, not for the span action.
E.g. we verify the hook build plan, not the attributes geenrated at runtime.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dismissed @mariusoe from a discussion.
Reviewable status: 12 of 14 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mariusoe)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 8 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 12 of 14 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mariusoe)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r3.
Reviewable status: 13 of 14 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mariusoe)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r3.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
This change is