Introduce issue templates

[MariusBrill]

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1312 (46e4768) into master (d37a7dc) will decrease coverage by 2.21%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1312      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     83.00%   80.79%   -2.21%     
- Complexity     1736     2025     +289     
============================================
  Files           174      204      +30     
  Lines          5366     6460    +1094     
  Branches        650      769     +119     
============================================
+ Hits           4454     5219     +765     
- Misses          675      950     +275     
- Partials        237      291      +54     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...spectit/ocelot/core/utils/WeakMethodReference.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-77.27%)	⬇️
...strap/correlation/noop/NoopLogTraceCorrelator.java	28.57% <0.00%> (-42.86%)	⬇️
...ial/ScheduledExecutorContextPropagationSensor.java	82.05% <0.00%> (-12.39%)	⬇️
...pectit/ocelot/config/loaders/ConfigFileLoader.java	82.61% <0.00%> (-8.70%)	⬇️
...lot/bootstrap/context/noop/NoopContextManager.java	10.00% <0.00%> (-6.67%)	⬇️
...core/instrumentation/InstrumentationTriggerer.java	85.19% <0.00%> (-5.63%)	⬇️
...t/ocelot/config/validation/PropertyPathHelper.java	75.56% <0.00%> (-5.06%)	⬇️
...rocks/inspectit/ocelot/config/utils/CaseUtils.java	90.48% <0.00%> (-4.98%)	⬇️
...t/ocelot/core/instrumentation/hook/MethodHook.java	95.35% <0.00%> (-4.65%)	⬇️
...del/metrics/definition/ViewDefinitionSettings.java	45.45% <0.00%> (-4.55%)	⬇️
... and 92 more

[aaronweissler]

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @MariusBrill)

[heiko-holz]

Reviewed 2 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @MariusBrill)

---

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md, line 25 at r1 (raw file):

**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
If you have a Stacktrace, please copy and paste it here as text.

Do we rather want the users to put the stacktrace into the screenshots sections or add a section stacktrace?

[MariusBrill]

@heiko-holz good question! I think we could either rename the section to something like Additional Material or introduce a second section Stacktraces (or any other speaking name).

What would you say is the better option?

[heiko-holz]

I would favor "Additional information (screenshots, stacktrace, ."

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @MariusBrill)

[aaronweissler]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @MariusBrill)