Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please review continuous queries #2253

Closed
wildchild opened this issue Apr 12, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Please review continuous queries #2253

wildchild opened this issue Apr 12, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@wildchild
Copy link

There are just 2 tests for CQ: create and show https://github.com/influxdb/influxdb/blob/master/cmd/influxd/server_integration_test.go#L1260

A lot of pending issues for such core feature indicates that CQ is far from being usable. Please cover at least querying and deletion. I can't get select from measurement created by CQ working, so I can't write it myself. Docs are outdated, creation how it's described in docs does not work at all.

@beckettsean
Copy link
Contributor

@wildchild CQs were unhooked for a significant part of 0.9.0 development. They have only recently been re-enabled and there is a lot of known work to cover before they are back to parity or better than 0.8.8, documentation included.

@mlbaron
Copy link

mlbaron commented Apr 28, 2015

Just wanted to +1 this, as I'm unsuccessfully trying to apply "old style" continuous queries from 0.8.8 to my 0.9.0 DB and I'm not sure what the correct syntax is here. Thanks!

@marcosnils
Copy link
Contributor

@mbaron007 CQ's are unusable at this moment in 0.9. However if you want to check the syntax to create them you should use the Influxql(https://github.com/influxdb/influxdb/blob/master/influxql/INFLUXQL.md) as a reference

@mlbaron
Copy link

mlbaron commented Apr 28, 2015

@marcosnils Great, thanks! Just to clarify: even if I construct and submit a continuous query to my 0.9 DB, you'er saying I currently shouldn't expect that to work, correct? Thanks again.

@marcosnils
Copy link
Contributor

Exactly. They most likely don't work
On Apr 28, 2015 4:25 PM, "MBaron007" [email protected] wrote:

@marcosnils https://github.com/marcosnils Great, thanks! Just to
clarify: even if I construct and submit a continuous query to my 0.9 DB,
you'er saying I currently shouldn't expect that to work, correct? Thanks
again.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2253 (comment).

@beckettsean
Copy link
Contributor

This is almost certainly fixed by #2552, which is included in RC30.

mark-rushakoff pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants