-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eslint-module-utils tests #865
eslint-module-utils tests #865
Conversation
* benmosher/master: update CI to build on Node 6+7 (import-js#846) changelog update for 2.3.0
…h_in_parser_options * commit '3c46d308ccb462a52554257c49c374045d1a6cf7': rollback utils dependency to 2.0.0 add yank note to utils change log add yanking note to root change log Upgrade debug version of eslint-module-utils (import-js#844) remove obsolete dad joke update utils changelog bump eslint-module-utils to v2.1.0 bump v2.4.0 fix typos, enforce type of array of strings in allow option update CHANGELOG.md eslint-module-utils: filePath in parserOptions (import-js#840) write doc, add two more tests add allow glob for rule no-unassigned-import, fix import-js#671 # Conflicts: # utils/CHANGELOG.md
1 similar comment
@@ -144,8 +145,7 @@ Yanked due to critical issue in eslint-module-utils with cache key resulting fro | |||
- Something horrible happened during `npm prepublish` of 1.10.1. | |||
Several `rm -rf node_modules && npm i` and `gulp clean && npm prepublish`s later, it is rebuilt and republished as 1.10.2. Thanks [@rhettlivingston] for noticing and reporting! | |||
|
|||
## [1.10.1] - 2016-07-02 [ | |||
ED] | |||
## [1.10.1] - 2016-07-02 [YANKED] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's use "unpublished" here; "yanked" is an idiom and needlessly casual.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ljharb I don't mind, but that's @benmosher's, I just fixed the typo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I didn't realize it was an existing pattern. Nvm then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fwiw, I thought YANKED
was a bit weird also, but I used it because it was explicitly defined on http://keepachangelog.com/ when I started it. I'm fine to move to UNPUBLISHED
if that's generally well-understood
1 similar comment
This is great, thanks! appveyor failure was some nonsense so LGTM |
No description provided.