Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

99 implement another data retriever that requests information by pid #100

Conversation

ywarnecke
Copy link
Member

Closes #99

…ment-another-data-retriever-that-requests-information-by-pid

# Conflicts:
#	pom.xml
#	src/main/java/de/imi/mopat/config/ApplicationSecurityConfig.java
@ywarnecke ywarnecke self-assigned this Oct 21, 2024
@ywarnecke ywarnecke requested a review from storckmi as a code owner October 21, 2024 08:46
…data-retriever-that-requests-information-by-pid

# Conflicts:
#	db/update/v3.2.sql
Copy link

Test Results:

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⏭️Failed ❌
JUnit Test Report994 ran984 passed10 skipped0 failed

@ywarnecke ywarnecke changed the base branch from v3.2 to 88-multiple-patientretriever-configurations-for-each-clinic November 25, 2024 08:22
@ywarnecke ywarnecke changed the base branch from 88-multiple-patientretriever-configurations-for-each-clinic to v3.2 November 25, 2024 08:23
@ywarnecke ywarnecke changed the base branch from v3.2 to 88-multiple-patientretriever-configurations-for-each-clinic November 25, 2024 15:12
…mation-by-pid' into 88-multiple-patientretriever-configurations-for-each-clinic
Copy link

Test Results:

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⏭️Failed ❌
JUnit Test Report1007 ran997 passed10 skipped0 failed

1 similar comment
Copy link

Test Results:

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⏭️Failed ❌
JUnit Test Report1007 ran997 passed10 skipped0 failed

Copy link
Member Author

@ywarnecke ywarnecke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adjustments to #88 were made

@ywarnecke ywarnecke merged commit 2913593 into 88-multiple-patientretriever-configurations-for-each-clinic Nov 25, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants