Port codecov to new configuration

[j-rivero]

See gazebo-tooling/action-gz-ci#32

Signed-off-by: Jose Luis Rivero [email protected]

[adlarkin]

Would it be worth merging this and then forward porting it to main instead of having a separate PR (#169) for main?

[adlarkin]

I'm also seeing a failure in GitHub actions:

make: *** No rule to make target 'coverage'.  Stop.

[adlarkin]

@j-rivero friendly ping

[j-rivero]

@j-rivero friendly ping

thanks! I've disabled codecov, if I'm not wrong there is no support in this repository for it

[adlarkin]

I've disabled codecov, if I'm not wrong there is no support in this repository for it

All checks pass, so I'm approving this 👍 @scpeters or @chapulina, beofre we merge this, can one of you confirm that disabling codecov in this repository is okay?

[chapulina]

disabling codecov in this repository is okay?

Yup, I think it should be ok because we aren't generating coverage data either for the tests in examples nor the tests in test. Not sure if there would be an easy way of adding coverage for CMake files, and I think we shouldn't bother with the utilities C++ code since that's being moved to ign-utils.

[adlarkin]

Sounds good 👍 merging!