Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

raw values type #120

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023
Merged

raw values type #120

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

nedmsmith
Copy link
Collaborator

@nedmsmith nedmsmith commented Aug 15, 2023

Added text to the Raw Values Type section. Fixes issue #9, partially

Added text to the Raw Values Type section. Fixes issue #9
Raw value measurements are typically vendor defined values that are checked by Verifiers
for consistency only, since the security relevance is opaque to Verifiers.

There are two parts to a `raw-value-group`, a measurement and an optional mask.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

optional mask

Just looking at this PR and not the whole document: is it clear what mask means here?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue #9 will be worked further

between the various forms.

The mask is applied by the Verifier as part of appraisal.
Only the raw value bits with corresponding TRUE mask bits are compared during appraisal.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above. Does this text lead to implementable behavior?

Copy link
Collaborator

@andrew-draper andrew-draper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Text in line 1003 could be better phrased, but this change is better than the previous document so approving

Copy link
Collaborator

@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande merged commit c026bb5 into main Aug 16, 2023
@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande deleted the raw-value-type branch August 16, 2023 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants