Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that the ACS information model is normative #349

Open
deeglaze opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #352
Open

Clarify that the ACS information model is normative #349

deeglaze opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #352

Comments

@deeglaze
Copy link
Collaborator

deeglaze commented Nov 27, 2024

We're doing a lot of work to translate the behavior of triples into the information they convey when verified. We need to ensure that verifier implementers understand that they need to present this information in their chosen data model to later stages.

deeglaze added a commit to deeglaze/draft-ietf-rats-corim that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
This makes the appraisal specification of every triple normative for
what later phases can depend on.
Fixes ietf-rats-wg#349

Signed-off-by: Dionna Glaze <[email protected]>
@deeglaze deeglaze linked a pull request Nov 27, 2024 that will close this issue
deeglaze added a commit to deeglaze/draft-ietf-rats-corim that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
This makes the appraisal specification of every triple normative for
what later phases can depend on.
Fixes ietf-rats-wg#349

Signed-off-by: Dionna Glaze <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant