Merge pull request #2118 from lauragarrison87/open-practices-blog-fix

minor rephrase to minimize redundancy

_posts/2024-09-01-vis-2024-openpractices-report.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Open Practices recommends uploading a preprint of your work to a free and open-a
 115 (93%) of accepted submissions used at least one supplemental material field, whether PCS, external, or both PCS and through an external link.
 ![Made use of at least one supplemental material field in PCS]({{ 'assets/posts/2024-09-OP/suppl_upload_text.png' | relative_url }})
 
-While not all papers necessarily have relevant supplemental material (for instance, position papers), for nearly all paper contributions, having supplemental material (like experimental data, code bases, or even just additional proofs and analyses) helps the work to be scrutinizable, so we view this high percentage as a step in the right direction. We do, however, recommend uploads to **both** (1) PCS for review as well as (2) a free, reliable, and long-term archive. Furthermore, our recommendations for alignment with VIS's long-term Open Science goals are uploading to **both** PCS for review and a free, reliable, and long-term archive. This redundancy allows both a static copy of record associated with the entry in the IEEE digital library, as well as an open and more easily scrutinized or re-analyzed version of the work.
+While not all papers necessarily have relevant supplemental material (for instance, position papers), for nearly all paper contributions, having supplemental material (like experimental data, code bases, or even just additional proofs and analyses) helps the work to be scrutinizable, so we view this high percentage as a step in the right direction. We do, however, recommend uploads to **both** (1) PCS for review as well as (2) a free, reliable, and long-term archive, in alignment with VIS's long-term Open Science goals. This redundancy allows both a static copy of record associated with the entry in the IEEE digital library, as well as an open and more easily scrutinized or re-analyzed version of the work.
 
 Besides PCS, where did accepted submissions upload their supplementary material?