Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.9.6 #87

Open
5 of 6 tasks
ideag opened this issue Jan 6, 2017 · 5 comments
Open
5 of 6 tasks

v0.9.6 #87

ideag opened this issue Jan 6, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ideag
Copy link
Owner

ideag commented Jan 6, 2017

It is way, way past time to release a new version. There are a couple of bugs that need to be fixed and some feature requests to be considered. I'll use this ticket to keep track of all the things that need to be done for the next release.

@ideag ideag added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jan 6, 2017
@ideag ideag self-assigned this Jan 6, 2017
@khromov
Copy link
Collaborator

khromov commented Jan 6, 2017

Great initiative, will try to help as much as I can.

@ideag
Copy link
Owner Author

ideag commented Jan 7, 2017

Looking over the open tickets I started wondering if we should do a 0.9.6 before we do a 1.0.0. I'd love to cover all of the above for 1.0.0, but I think #69 and #67 depends on us making a switch from storing CC data in post_meta to a CPT (as offered in #79) or transients (your suggestion). And that touches #51 as well, probably.

And if we decide to do the switch, refactoring + a migration script = quite a big bit of work, that will probably take a while.
Meanwhile #82 and #83 already has PR's and some kind of solutions for #86 #85 #89 are also quite doable over this weekend, and there is no reason to keep them unreleased.

What do you think, @khromov ?

@ideag
Copy link
Owner Author

ideag commented Jan 9, 2017

Thanks for all the prompt replies on the support forum @khromov. I really need to get better at doing support. Any thoughts about the 0.9.6 vs `.1.0.0.´? Image caching is currently proving to cause more problems that it is worth, probably. So it might be a good idea to nix it until we solve it properly.

@khromov
Copy link
Collaborator

khromov commented Jan 9, 2017

@ideag Not opposed to that. I think that we should ship a mechanism for deleting old cached images in the media library for 0.9.6, so that people can revert to no image caching easily. I'll have some time this weekend to look into that.

Image caching right now seems to have a particularly nasty bug with the "infinite loop" image download. I've been over the code a lot and can't find it, I'm thinking either object cache issue or something with hook/filter invocation order, but I'm very much for disabling it for now and also have a way to clean up existing sites.

@ideag
Copy link
Owner Author

ideag commented Jan 10, 2017

Alright, if you could tackle the image cleanup script, we could release the 0.9.6 next Monday. And we'll move #69 #67 to 1.0.0 (i'll make a separate issue for that). I also think it must be object caching interfering somehow, otherwise it would be a much more widespread issue.

@ideag ideag changed the title v1.0.0 v0.9.6 Jan 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants