Combination of domain solutions. #17131
-
Does Moose allow for the solution of equations (in time) in two separate domains? For example, T in Omega 1, and p in Omega 2, then another solution in a third domain Omega 3 using the solution of T, and p from the initial two solutions and then feedback into Omega 1 for another iteration of solutions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
Ah, so you would like to try and use the restart system to combine two solutions in some meanginful way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Different mesh domains so that the mesh deformation in one domain has no effect on the other. The first domain (Energy Eq) has no internal geometry, the second domain has physical internal geometry (Structural Eq), the third domain only needs a mesh grid sufficient to capture the combined effects of the other two mesh domains. It then implicitly feeds information via a boundary equation back into the first to account for energy deformation based on the position of the second.
Thank you for your interest in my problem.
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
…________________________________
From: John <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 1:42:23 PM
To: idaholab/moose <[email protected]>
Cc: WISE, TAMMY <[email protected]>; Author <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [idaholab/moose] Combination of domain solutions. (#17131)
Ah, so you would like to try and use the restart system to combine two solutions in some meanginful way.
Are the meshes different? or is it just two different problems solved on the same mesh?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b23bd806-eda0e0de-b23b96c7-866cdd2c00cc-0a2528048cbea04a&q=1&e=b0ce66f7-f6d7-4f69-a881-072ba9c0ec71&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fidaholab%2Fmoose%2Fdiscussions%2F17131%23discussioncomment-415617>, or unsubscribe<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=45721aab-1ae92273-4572546a-866cdd2c00cc-a97f2ab73afa3a54&q=1&e=b0ce66f7-f6d7-4f69-a881-072ba9c0ec71&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAJQ6AYVZCSKMVFK4JWAIPITTBKFA7ANCNFSM4YFPGBMA>.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I will solve the Naiver Stokes equation with density and viscosity properties that vary with pressure and temperature. Would the method you suggested be applicable for the NS equation in domain one?
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
…________________________________
From: John <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:02:55 PM
To: idaholab/moose <[email protected]>
Cc: WISE, TAMMY <[email protected]>; Author <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [idaholab/moose] Combination of domain solutions. (#17131)
Well if the first domain is just a scalar ODE you can use the ScalarKernels system to get your solution and then add them using a AuxKernel
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b8eee29c-e775dbc7-b8eeac5d-862a37e2f896-b7919afe0108e3b1&q=1&e=0f050c55-4574-48a5-9221-cb0224fc4418&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fidaholab%2Fmoose%2Fdiscussions%2F17131%23discussioncomment-415666>, or unsubscribe<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5ca7ad3-aa514388-f5ca3412-862a37e2f896-5fcb047fbe6ecd42&q=1&e=0f050c55-4574-48a5-9221-cb0224fc4418&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAJQ6AYVHPBXZ5GFUVEKBGT3TBKHN7ANCNFSM4YFPGBMA>.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You may want to leverage the multiapp system to separate each solve. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
You may want to leverage the multiapp system to separate each solve.
Any specific reason you are trying to avoid coupling the equations in a single solve?