Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(pyarrow): support __arrow_c_schema__ on ibis.Schema objects #9665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

jcrist
Copy link
Member

@jcrist jcrist commented Jul 22, 2024

Part of #9660.

@cpcloud cpcloud added this to the 9.2 milestone Jul 22, 2024
@cpcloud cpcloud added the feature Features or general enhancements label Jul 22, 2024
@cpcloud cpcloud enabled auto-merge (squash) July 22, 2024 21:02
@cpcloud cpcloud merged commit 00a776e into ibis-project:main Jul 22, 2024
84 checks passed
@jcrist jcrist deleted the arrow-c-schema branch July 22, 2024 21:28
pytest.importorskip("pyarrow")
schema = sch.Schema({"a": dt.int64, "b": dt.string, "c": dt.boolean})
# smoketest, since no way to create schema from capsule in current pyarrow
assert schema.__arrow_c_schema__() is not None

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pa.schema will use the __arrow_c_schema__ method for recent pyarrow (v15+ I think).

I sometimes use a wrapper class in tests to ensure it sees only the __arrow_c_schema__ method:

class CSchemaWrapper:
    def __init__(obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __arrow_c_schema__(self):
        return self.obj.__arrow_c_schema__()

then check

pa.schema(CSchemaWrapper(schema))

Copy link

@corleyma corleyma Jul 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fwiw, I tried this (pa.schema(ibis_schema)) with the ibis 9.2.0 and pyarrow 17.0 and alas, no dice:

File [~/test-hook/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyarrow/types.pxi:5360](https://notebooks.freenome.net/user/mcorley/lab/tree/test-hook/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyarrow/types.pxi#line=5359), in pyarrow.lib.schema()

File [~/test-hook/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyarrow/types.pxi:3541](https://notebooks.freenome.net/user/mcorley/lab/tree/test-hook/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyarrow/types.pxi#line=3540), in pyarrow.lib.field()

File [~/test-hook/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyarrow/types.pxi:5301](https://notebooks.freenome.net/user/mcorley/lab/tree/test-hook/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyarrow/types.pxi#line=5300), in pyarrow.lib.ensure_type()

TypeError: DataType expected, got <class 'ibis.expr.datatypes.core.String'>

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's something odd going on with our base classes and whatever mechanism that pyarrow is using to invoke the method.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Arg, pyarrow first checks whether the input is a Mapping and then checks whether __arrow_c_schema__ exists 😞

Copy link
Member

@cpcloud cpcloud Jul 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like this functionality is broken in pyarrow: an object can't be both a mapping and implement the __arrow_c_schema__ interface.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opened up apache/arrow#43388 to track this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the meantime I'll add an xfailing test that will start to pass once this is addressed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Features or general enhancements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants