-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added ursa to the core.ubuntu.dockerfile install #1687
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Philipp Schlarb <[email protected]>
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
(ci) test this please |
I get the following errors when trying to build with this dockerfile:
|
The underlying issue in my case is this that the version of |
The issue was introduced here; 5bf71f4 and then fixed here; 6bd7f20 There is no package associated to the fix because the Jenkins builds have been failing to publish since October 14th. I'd recommend switching over to the builds published via the GHA workflows.
|
The Jenkins CD builds have been partially stuck due to |
The problem still persists to date. I got the following error while trying to build node with docker:
@WadeBarnes Is there some workaround to this problem, esp. because this thread is 8 months old? Thanks in advance. |
@pSchlarb Could you provide a brief update on this PR? With recent branch changes and the current development process on Indy Node/Plenum, we are wondering if these changes are still viable. If so, please close this PR and retarget it to We will discuss and determine which PRs should be merged or closed at the next Indy Contributors Working Group meeting on May 9, 2023. |
I think I will encounter this issue during the testing for the new network from scratch documentation. And if persistent will fix it with that PR,if that is ok. Or should it be 2 separate prs @WadeBarnes? |
@pSchlarb, One PR would be fine. I'd close this PR. |
Testpool started with the pool_start.sh script after the changes
Fixes #1624
Signed-off-by: Philipp Schlarb [email protected]