feat(connector-iroha): adds connector plugin

[hanxu12]

1. Enables Cactus to manipulate Iroha ledger
2. Supports 19/20 commands and 14/15 queries of the Iroha ledger. (removePeer and fetchCommits have not been fully implemented)
3. Possibility of starting Iroha and Postgres with random ports.
4. Possibility of passing arbitrary Iroha admin/node keypairs to the test ledger.
5. Offers a comprehensive run transaction test suite to validate the support for Iroha ledger commands and queries.
6. Provides an example of asset transfer between two separate Iroha nodes.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1169 (985dd14) into main (d9f6d5d) will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 67.32%.

❗ Current head 985dd14 differs from pull request most recent head 691bed8. Consider uploading reports for the commit 691bed8 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1169      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.83%   71.69%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         278      292      +14     
  Lines       10019    10525     +506     
  Branches     1242     1282      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits         7197     7546     +349     
- Misses       2159     2302     +143     
- Partials      663      677      +14     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...enerated/openapi/typescript-axios/configuration.ts	9.09% <9.09%> (ø)
...cript/generated/openapi/typescript-axios/common.ts	43.47% <43.47%> (ø)
...ain/typescript/prometheus-exporter/data-fetcher.ts	50.00% <50.00%> (ø)
...escript/generated/openapi/typescript-axios/base.ts	58.33% <58.33%> (ø)
...pescript/generated/openapi/typescript-axios/api.ts	61.38% <61.38%> (ø)
...ces/get-prometheus-exporter-metrics-endpoint-v1.ts	62.06% <62.06%> (ø)
...c/main/typescript/plugin-ledger-connector-iroha.ts	71.10% <71.10%> (ø)
...escript/prometheus-exporter/prometheus-exporter.ts	73.33% <73.33%> (ø)
...-connector-iroha/src/main/typescript/public-api.ts	87.50% <87.50%> (ø)
...ypescript/web-services/run-transaction-endpoint.ts	88.37% <88.37%> (ø)
... and 21 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d9f6d5d...691bed8. Read the comment docs.

[petermetz]

@hxlaf The contents under packages/cactus-test-tooling/src/main/typescript/iroha/example/ can be safely deleted I assume? Or if they are needed for something then we need to find them a different location because the ./src/main/ folder is designed to hold only code that is meant to be deployed to production (so the directory called example does not sound like it should be in there)

[baziorek]

I've checked all not generated automatically files with "iroha" in directory path. I see 100 files modified, rather not all of them by You so I suggest to remove files not modified by You from the PR - it would be easier for reviewers:). E.g. file rather not modified by You: docs/source/support/xdai.md

I'm not TypeScript specialist, so I've ignored many things connected with style (left commented code).

[baziorek]

There are few lines of commented code, but not much, but the PR looks good for me (Hyperledger Iroha's site).

[petermetz]

LGTM

[petermetz]

@hxlaf If you fix the commit lint issue afterwards it should be good to go

[hanxu12]

@hxlaf If you fix the commit lint issue afterwards it should be good to go

Thank you! Will talk to you tomorrow!

[takeutak]

@petermetz Thanks for contributing!
We are also planning to release the iroha connector (socket.io typed) using python. Then we would like to develop it according to the following plans.

(1) Iroha connector using python can coexist with this product because of the difference of the communication type and language.
(2) I'd like to make some degree of consistency between the above two types of Iroha connector. Then I'm planning to make a request to enhance the function sets.

If you agree with the above plans, I can immediately approve these works because these works #1169 #1183 is independent of the works on the above plans.
Otherwise, I'd like to make some requests for adjustments to the function sets on these works before approving it.
So, would you mind if you agree with the above plans? @petermetz