fix(commit_store): fix bug in get_batch_by_transaction

[suchapalaver]

This PR fixes a bug in the sawtooth_validator::journal::commit_store::CommitStore's get_batch_by_transaction method, which heretofore returned the first batch that does not contain the provided transaction_id argument without any error.

The equivalent Python method calls the Rust method via FFI:

# validator/sawtooth_validator/journal/block_store.py

def get_batch_by_transaction(self, transaction_id):
        """
        Check to see if the requested transaction_id is in the current chain.
        If so, find the batch that has the transaction referenced by the
        transaction_id and return the batch. This is done by finding the block
        and searching for the batch.

        :param transaction_id (string): The id of the transaction that is being
            requested.
        :return:
        The batch that has the transaction.
        """
        payload = self._get_data_by_id(
            transaction_id, 'commit_store_get_batch_by_transaction')

        batch = Batch()
        batch.ParseFromString(payload)

        return batch

Here's commit_store_get_batch_by_transaction, which is called in the snippet above and calls get_batch_by_transaction:

//! validator/src/journal/commit_store_ffi.rs

#[no_mangle]
pub unsafe extern "C" fn commit_store_get_batch_by_transaction(
    commit_store: *mut c_void,
    transaction_id: *const c_char,
    batch_ptr: *mut *const u8,
    batch_len: *mut usize,
    batch_cap: *mut usize,
) -> ErrorCode {
    check_null!(commit_store, transaction_id);

    match deref_cstr(transaction_id) {
        Ok(transaction_id) => {
            match (*(commit_store as *mut CommitStore)).get_batch_by_transaction(transaction_id) {
                Ok(batch) => return_batch(batch, batch_ptr, batch_len, batch_cap),
                Err(err) => map_database_error(err),
            }
        }
        Err(err) => err,
    }
}

Concomitant changes were merged into sawtooth-lib in this PR.

Original work

Signed-off-by: Joseph Livesey [email protected]

[vaporos]

Would it also work to just remove the "!" before "batch"? (If so, it would keep the performance of using any instead of all.)

[suchapalaver]

@vaporos done.

[vaporos]

Rebase should resolve the jenkins build error (it should be excluded).