Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add optional generic parameter to NextResponse (vercel#47526)
Fixes vercel#45943 ### What? Allow for type checking the return type of a Route Handler in the `app/` directory: [TypeScript Playground](https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/MYewdgzgLgBAkgOQCoFEBKCCCAZAyjAXhlwE8BbAIxABsAKAcgEswoBTAJzAENqZ3WIAB3ARW9AJQAoSawAew9rGDUuECDARyoaAcMisAPACEQAExKEYAVzABrMCADuYAHwwtrMKfU6hI1jAA3pIwMADaiKgYOLgAugBcQSGhMCbmAPyJaSQANMkAvtKhoJBQ7FbAUCDstFQZWWYkcGCMsAA+MGBW1NQ5MMytib56os2tloH54kkpMBBWghy1jX0DUFLJoVAAFowQEcjoWHixE4WhhcnQXFCMwDAAVhDgBgBSz2DZLsvmie-g2VWLSgmRgw38Y3WiU0sm0un8bw+XxmKQA9KiYAABKAQAC0ckWlXx7HY1RgSF26j2nRAsGYMGojAoqNMIDIfEYAHNtrAHI4+lwvDBHAFgIL6LAuFZOWRPHSoAA6TYwErQPjw-RDDWiSzg-QKp7gH65frAqSzfhQKycTqsRwaLR60S0fh+fV1E2ukasc0wQqXAnVWAAMxslUY4BgAHEUEhaOJoY7tYZAlwKMBEgBGABMAGZ8m5AjB0dHPBw7jAuOxOVZZSwYIJVKJTMlGMGYLQALI3bYK9iC1lkeMwNwABgVAFZpkXlZbrWAHbCnawDR9aKn01m81NixjAKDkNPcJOqiQ9Kuq-EqBWSc5tMLhbtEq6NgVMrGDiXosm-9B3JYPHCkuwp6NKaoAkqwV4BvIQYwKGYDhpGMZINm8aJkuyZBLuGggDAnJluwFZVjWdawFYzatu2XY9n2A5ssOY6TtOMCzqwVp3kmj4roaYDrmmGYwDm+bTP+h6ASelZgBYZ5cMAwCsIIbAthcN5sfOi4Pt6z68a+76ft+si-iJ+5icewGSdJoGyfJimsC2hRAA) ![Screenshot 2023-03-25 at 16 59 51](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1935696/227728328-43350f50-5067-4d27-8701-000569e757cc.png) ### Why? There is currently no nice way to enforce the return type of a Route Handler in the `app/` directory. This is possible with `NextApiResponse` in the `pages/` directory, because of this PR: - vercel#7841 ### How? This implements a generic parameter for the `NextResponse` class, which can be used to pass a type argument when setting the return type for a Route Handler. <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> --------- Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Loading branch information