Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Change tensors to integers for torch.dynamo and torch.compile compatibility #23475

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2023

Conversation

loevlie
Copy link
Contributor

@loevlie loevlie commented May 19, 2023

What does this PR do?

Fixes errors when trying to use PyTorch 2.0 torch.compile().

In the two fixes I suggested, we addressed the following issue:

torch.split() was expecting a list of integers specifying how to split the tensor along a given dimension. However, it received a list of scalar tensors instead. This mismatch was causing the TorchRuntimeError.

In the first instance, the tensor value_spatial_shapes was passed to the function as a list of scalar tensors, which resulted in the error. By converting them to integers using the .item() method, the error was resolved.

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

@amyeroberts @sgugger

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev
Copy link

HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev commented May 19, 2023

The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sgugger sgugger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, maybe @amyeroberts you could have a second look?
Can you run make fix-copies on your branch to fix the issue with the repo consistency check?

@sgugger
Copy link
Collaborator

sgugger commented May 19, 2023

You undid your changes, you will need to make them in the file that mas2former copies from 😅

@loevlie
Copy link
Contributor Author

loevlie commented May 19, 2023

Oh bummer! Thank you for your patience. I will try to fix it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@amyeroberts amyeroberts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks for fixing this!

@sgugger sgugger merged commit 847e569 into huggingface:main May 19, 2023
sheonhan pushed a commit to sheonhan/transformers that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…mpatibility (huggingface#23475)

* Fix: Change tensors to integers in torch.split() for torch.dynamo and torch.compile compatibility

* Applied the suggested fix to the utils/check_copies.py test

* Applied the suggested fix by changing the original function that gets copied
gojiteji pushed a commit to gojiteji/transformers that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2023
…mpatibility (huggingface#23475)

* Fix: Change tensors to integers in torch.split() for torch.dynamo and torch.compile compatibility

* Applied the suggested fix to the utils/check_copies.py test

* Applied the suggested fix by changing the original function that gets copied
novice03 pushed a commit to novice03/transformers that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
…mpatibility (huggingface#23475)

* Fix: Change tensors to integers in torch.split() for torch.dynamo and torch.compile compatibility

* Applied the suggested fix to the utils/check_copies.py test

* Applied the suggested fix by changing the original function that gets copied
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants