Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC7234: "disconnected" #5

Closed
mnot opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

RFC7234: "disconnected" #5

mnot opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
@mnot
Labels
caching has-proposal

Comments

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Apr 29, 2015

Caching still refers to a "disconnected" state, as well as "cannot reach" and similar states. This needs to be rationalised.

See thread:
http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAvUidMuV=e_yQZQjbqTr42afyvv1-5ambwBT5EcFL18juauWQ@mail.gmail.com
@wsargent wsargent mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2017
Closed
@mnot mnot added the caching label Jun 20, 2017
@mnot mnot self-assigned this Jun 29, 2018
@mnot
Copy link
Member Author

mnot commented Oct 9, 2018

Should wait for resolution of #139.

@mnot
Copy link
Member Author

mnot commented Nov 13, 2018

I'm inclined to move the definition of "disconnected" up into "overview of cache operation" and refer to it consistently -- including when "cannot be reached" is used.

@mnot mnot mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2018
Merged
@mnot mnot closed this as completed in d86e194 Dec 2, 2018
reschke added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2018
@reschke
changelog order (#5)
b287c9d
@wsargent wsargent mentioned this issue Feb 23, 2019
Closed
@mnot mnot mentioned this issue Feb 11, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mnot mnot

Labels
caching has-proposal
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mnot