-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only update history when Turbo visit is renderable #601
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not on the Turbo team and have a bias towards getting this merged but this looks good to me 😄
@@ -16,15 +17,18 @@ export class PageView extends View<Element, PageSnapshot, PageViewRenderer, Page | |||
lastRenderedLocation = new URL(location.href) | |||
forceReloaded = false | |||
|
|||
renderPage(snapshot: PageSnapshot, isPreview = false, willRender = true) { | |||
renderPage(snapshot: PageSnapshot, isPreview = false, willRender = true, visit?: Visit) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably in a follow-up refactor but it's starting to look like this function should take in a "options" object rather than individual arguments.
<hr class="push-off-screen"> | ||
|
||
<h2 id="middle">Middle the page</h2> | ||
<hr class="push-off-screen"> | ||
<h2>Down the page</h2> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nit-pick but:
<hr class="push-off-screen"> | |
<h2 id="middle">Middle the page</h2> | |
<hr class="push-off-screen"> | |
<h2>Down the page</h2> | |
<hr class="push-off-screen"> | |
<h2 id="middle">Middle the page</h2> | |
<hr class="push-off-screen"> | |
<h2>Down the page</h2> |
visit.loadCachedSnapshot() | ||
visit.issueRequest() | ||
visit.changeHistory() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not positive, but moving the history changing to PageView
might have implications for the native adapters for iOS and Android. The adapters will still be calling visit.changeHistory
themselves, so it will be called twice:
- https://github.com/hotwired/turbo-ios/blob/2277f7d/Source/WebView/turbo.js#L71
- https://github.com/hotwired/turbo-android/blob/14ad418/turbo/src/main/assets/js/turbo_bridge.js#L70
The second should be a no-op because history will have been flagged as changed, but I think we'll still have the same problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how do we avoid calling it twice now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's only called once by each adapter now. If we move it out of the browser adapter, we may need to move it out of the other adapters as well. Perhaps we don't (it's been a while since I've looked at the native frameworks), but we need to make sure it behaves as expected on iOS and Android.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any tips on how to test that properly? Looking at https://github.com/manuelpuyol/turbo/blob/2eb9ea2c7282f1ec2b41c75705d7e43af7e2076a/src/core/drive/visit.ts#L173-L174 I'd expect it to not do a double update
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, it will be a no-op because we've already flagged history as having changed. My concern is that we're changing the behavior by moving this out of the adapter, so we just need to ensure it's all good on iOS and Android 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jayohms Can you verify whether this would bring any complication on native?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't foresee any issues on the mobile side, since as mentioned, the second visit.changeHistory
call will be a no-op, so the mobile adapters will continue to work as before. It'd be nice to update the mobile adapters to reflect this change, however, we've maintained backwards/forwards compatibility for all iterations of turbo/links
API changes.
I don't think we'll be able to reasonably make corresponding changes in the mobile adapters without exposing an additional API, so the adapters can know to conditionally change history (or not). This shouldn't be a problem in the short-term, but it may be a nuance that's difficult for others to understand as time goes on.
visit.loadCachedSnapshot() | ||
visit.issueRequest() | ||
visit.changeHistory() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't foresee any issues on the mobile side, since as mentioned, the second visit.changeHistory
call will be a no-op, so the mobile adapters will continue to work as before. It'd be nice to update the mobile adapters to reflect this change, however, we've maintained backwards/forwards compatibility for all iterations of turbo/links
API changes.
I don't think we'll be able to reasonably make corresponding changes in the mobile adapters without exposing an additional API, so the adapters can know to conditionally change history (or not). This shouldn't be a problem in the short-term, but it may be a nuance that's difficult for others to understand as time goes on.
|
||
if (!this.location) return | ||
|
||
window.location.href = this.location.toString() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any potential that this causes issues with or prevents reloads for same-page anchors? I'm not clear if that situation is possible here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't imagine a case where a same-page anchor causes a full page reload
* main: Drive Browser tests with `playwright` (hotwired#609) Allow Turbo Streams w/ GET via `data-turbo-stream` (hotwired#612) Only update history when Turbo visit is renderable (hotwired#601) Support development ChromeDriver version overrides (hotwired#606) Turbo stream source (hotwired#415) Expose Frame load state via `[complete]` attribute (hotwired#487)
* main: Allow frames to scroll smoothly into view (hotwired#607) Export Type declarations for `turbo:` events (hotwired#452) Add .php as a valid isHTML extension (hotwired#629) Add original click event to 'turbo:click' details (hotwired#611) Drive Browser tests with `playwright` (hotwired#609) Allow Turbo Streams w/ GET via `data-turbo-stream` (hotwired#612) Only update history when Turbo visit is renderable (hotwired#601) Support development ChromeDriver version overrides (hotwired#606) Turbo stream source (hotwired#415) Expose Frame load state via `[complete]` attribute (hotwired#487) fix(ie/edge): form.method='delete', raises Invalid argument. (hotwired#586) Do not declare global types/constants (hotwired#524) Defensively create custom turbo elements (hotwired#483) Use `replaceChildren` in StreamActions.update (hotwired#534)
Closes hotwired#762 Changes made in [hotwired#601][] had unintended side-effects that prevented same-page anchor navigations from writing to the history. This commit adds a call to `Visit.updateHistory()` within `Visit.goToSamePageAnchor()` along with coverage in `src/tests/functional/navigation_tests.ts` to guard against future regressions. [hotwired#601]: hotwired#601
Closes #762 Changes made in [#601][] had unintended side-effects that prevented same-page anchor navigations from writing to the history. This commit adds a call to `Visit.updateHistory()` within `Visit.goToSamePageAnchor()` along with coverage in `src/tests/functional/navigation_tests.ts` to guard against future regressions. [#601]: #601
Follow up to #571, which ended up just moving around the scroll bug
Should close #387
Context
We've been experiencing some bugs when Turbo visits fail (e.g due to tracked element mismatches or visit-control reload), where Turbo was keeping the previous page scroll position after the page was updated:
Screen.Recording.2022-06-13.at.5.47.27.PM.mov
Problem
From what I see here, Turbo always manually updates the browser state using
visit.changeHistory()
. This will update the URL before we navigate to the new page. This is fine when Turbo replaces the body, since Turbo will manage everything for us.The problem lies when a visit is not possible, causing a
turbo:reload
event. In this case, Turbo was callingwindow.location.reload()
(after the URL was updated), which works like hitting the refresh button in the browser.Since the
reload
was called while the previous page was still loaded and scrolled,reload
will try to keep the scroll state after the new page loads, causing the bug.Proposed solution
Turbo should only update the browser history when it knows that it can handle the request. Since we don't actually need the new URL until we replace the body, we can wait for
renderPage
andrenderError
to know if the request is renderable or not.If the request is a success and Turbo can visit, it updates the history like before and continues on.
If the request fails for any reason (404, 500, visit control is reload, element mismatch....), Turbo will delegate to the browser to navigate to the new page, which now is done via
window.location.href
.Current state
Now, when we click an element that causes a full reload, the browser will either navigate to the top of the new page or to the location of the targeted element. Notice that when hitting the back button, the previous scroll position is preserved, improving navigation.
Screen.Recording.2022-06-14.at.12.00.30.PM.mov