Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update export_request_processor.pl - fixing prj bug #95

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

severinmenard
Copy link

Changed deprecated EPSG:3785 PRJ non recognized by ArcGIS by EPSG:3857 tested on ArcGIS. Should solve #94, #80, #76 and
#75

Changed deprecated EPSG:3785 PRJ non recognized by ArcGIS by EPSG:3857 tested on ArcGIS. Should solve hotosm#94, hotosm#80, hotosm#76 and
hotosm#75
@pnorman
Copy link

pnorman commented Apr 1, 2015

The OCG WKT for 3857 is
PROJCS["WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator",GEOGCS["Popular Visualisation CRS",DATUM["Popular_Visualisation_Datum",SPHEROID["Popular Visualisation Sphere",6378137,0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7059"]],TOWGS84[0,0,0,0,0,0,0],AUTHORITY["EPSG","6055"]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],UNIT["degree",0.01745329251994328,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","4055"]],UNIT["metre",1,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],PROJECTION["Mercator_1SP"],PARAMETER["central_meridian",0],PARAMETER["scale_factor",1],PARAMETER["false_easting",0],PARAMETER["false_northing",0],AUTHORITY["EPSG","3857"],AXIS["X",EAST],AXIS["Y",NORTH]]

I would think it would be better to use that, which is just a s/3785/3857/

@severinmenard
Copy link
Author

I have no problem with this one, as long as it works with ArcGIS, so it
must be tested first. I do not have ArcGIS, will meet ArcGIS users in a
couple of weeks, so meanwhile I would stick with my modification that uses
a prj info recognized by both QGIS and ArcGIS.
Le 1 avr. 2015 20:06, "Paul Norman" [email protected] a écrit :

The OCG WKT http://spatialreference.org/ref/sr-org/6864/ogcwkt/ for
3857 is
PROJCS["WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator",GEOGCS["Popular Visualisation
CRS",DATUM["Popular_Visualisation_Datum",SPHEROID["Popular Visualisation
Sphere",6378137,0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7059"]],TOWGS84[0,0,0,0,0,0,0],AUTHORITY["EPSG","6055"]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],UNIT["degree",0.01745329251994328,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","4055"]],UNIT["metre",1,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],PROJECTION["Mercator_1SP"],PARAMETER["central_meridian",0],PARAMETER["scale_factor",1],PARAMETER["false_easting",0],PARAMETER["false_northing",0],AUTHORITY["EPSG","3857"],AXIS["X",EAST],AXIS["Y",NORTH]]

I would think it would be better to use that, which is just a s/3785/3857/


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#95 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants