-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] batch transactions #82
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -292,16 +302,23 @@ contract HookCoveredCallImplV1 is | |||
uint128 strikePrice, | |||
uint32 expirationTime | |||
) external nonReentrant whenNotPaused returns (uint256) { | |||
address msgSender = msg.sender; | |||
emit log_named_address("msg.sender", msgSender); | |||
if (msg.sender == execAddr) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should be a modifier, that way we can always just use the msgSender variable. Or an alternative would be a library or internal function somehow, and we chang all other usages to msgSender (which falls back to msg.Sender if not the trusted proxy address)
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
contract BatchUtil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can be a library? perhaps should also be in a different file?
emit log_named_address("msg.sender", msgSender); | ||
if (msg.sender == execAddr) { | ||
msgSender = unpackTrailingParamMsgSender(); | ||
emit log_named_address("msgSender", msgSender); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should cut these logs?
@@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ contract HookProtocolTest is Test, EIP712, PermissionConstants { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
function setUpFullProtocol() public { | |||
exec = new Exec(); | |||
weth = new WETH(); | |||
protocol = new HookProtocol( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does it make sense to have exec
live on HookProtocol
and then just make the HookProtocol
address that all of these contracts already store the exec
address?
@@ -64,7 +67,9 @@ contract HookCoveredCallImplV1 is | |||
HookInstrumentERC721, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are there functions within here, like on the OZ contracts, that pay attention to msg.Sender... do we need to update them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems likely that we want to allow only a fixed set of external
functions call with msg.sender, but perhaps there are some like safeTransferFrom where that is not the case?
No description provided.