Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add riscv64 release #191

Closed
eshattow opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Add riscv64 release #191

eshattow opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@eshattow
Copy link

Debian has accepted riscv64 and is no longer only in ports status. There is a functioning debian-installer for riscv64 and it is running on real hardware (Home Assistant Yellow PoE with Milk-V Mars CM). The next step is software support for installing Home Assistant supervised. Can riscv64 arch be added for os-agent release? Thanks!

mengzhuo added a commit to mengzhuo/os-agent that referenced this issue May 23, 2024
@frenck
Copy link
Member

frenck commented May 23, 2024

Hi there @eshattow 👋

The Home Assistant project has strictly defined the architecture we support in an architectural decision record (stored in our architecture repository).

Therefore going to close this issue, as this is not an architecture we are currently willing to support.

../Frenck

@frenck frenck closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 23, 2024
@monsterLang
Copy link

Hi Frenck

Excuse me, is there any progress on the riscv64 version?

Thanks~

@eshattow
Copy link
Author

eshattow commented Jul 5, 2024

@monsterLang I guess there will be no development at all until https://github.com/home-assistant/architecture/blob/master/adr/0013-home-assistant-container.md is ammended to include riscv64

edit: I have started a discussion topic where we can continue about this at home-assistant/architecture#1107

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants