Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce timeout for network time synchronization to 15 seconds #3669

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

sairon
Copy link
Member

@sairon sairon commented Nov 13, 2024

The timeout of 90s was introduced before it was ensured that the timesync systemd unit starts after network is online. Now with that, it makes less sense to wait that long - if network is unreachable at the point the time synchronization starts, and the server fails to reply on the first sync, the polling interval is exponentially increased and the benefit of waiting for more attempts is doubtful.

Since another synchronization attempt is done after network changes its state, we should rely on that instead of having the 90 seconds interval as a waiting period for plugging the network cable. Worst case, there are other mechanisms that should set the time to a reasonably accurate value, making the NTP sync less importart for most of the cases.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Reduced the startup timeout for the time synchronization service from 90 seconds to 15 seconds, improving overall system responsiveness.

The timeout of 90s was introduced before it was ensured that the timesync
systemd unit starts after network is online. Now with that, it makes less sense
to wait that long - if network is unreachable at the point the time
synchronization starts, and the server fails to reply on the first sync, the
polling interval is exponentially increased and the benefit of waiting for more
attempts is doubtful.

Since another synchronization attempt is done after network changes its state,
we should rely on that instead of having the 90 seconds interval as a waiting
period for plugging the network cable. Worst case, there are other mechanisms
that should set the time to a reasonably accurate value, making the NTP sync
less importart for most of the cases.
@sairon sairon added the os label Nov 13, 2024
@sairon sairon requested a review from agners November 13, 2024 14:30
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the configuration of the systemd-time-wait-sync.service. Specifically, the TimeoutStartSec parameter has been reduced from 90 seconds to 15 seconds, altering the service's startup timeout duration.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
buildroot-external/rootfs-overlay/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-time-wait-sync.service.d/timeout.conf Updated TimeoutStartSec from 90s to 15s

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 180c9ad and f24ed41.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • buildroot-external/rootfs-overlay/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-time-wait-sync.service.d/timeout.conf (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
buildroot-external/rootfs-overlay/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-time-wait-sync.service.d/timeout.conf (1)

2-2: LGTM! The timeout reduction is well-justified.

The reduction from 90s to 15s is reasonable given that:

  1. The service starts after network is online
  2. Failed attempts lead to exponential backoff
  3. New sync attempts occur on network state changes
  4. Alternative time sources are available

Let's verify the service dependencies and behavior:

Consider monitoring the following metrics after deployment:

  1. Service start-up success rate
  2. Time synchronization accuracy
  3. Number of retry attempts in environments with poor connectivity

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sairon sairon merged commit 23039ce into dev Nov 13, 2024
3 checks passed
@sairon sairon deleted the reduce-time-wait-timeout branch November 13, 2024 16:14
@sairon sairon mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2024
@sairon sairon mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants