-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update squeezebox.markdown Clarification of LMS server usage #37030
Conversation
Clarify the integration connects to an exiting instance and doesn't provide the LMS control directly itself as this has come up a couple of times in the HA LMS add-no thread.
✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves a documentation update for the Squeezebox integration in Home Assistant. The change modifies the description of the integration's functionality, specifically clarifying how it connects to an existing LMS (Logitech Media Server) server and provides media players and sensors. The modification aims to provide a more precise explanation of the integration's capabilities and connection mechanism. Changes
The key modification is in the descriptive text, shifting from:
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
- GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown (1)
Line range hint
1-24
: Documentation structure and content are well-organized.The documentation effectively communicates the integration's functionality, configuration, and usage. The clarification about connecting to an existing LMS server helps address the confusion mentioned in the PR objectives.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: c0ffeeca7 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @pssc 👍
Clarify the integration connects to an exiting instance and doesn't provide the LMS control directly itself as this has come up a couple of times in the HA LMS add-no thread.
Proposed change
Type of change
current
branch).current
branch).next
branch).next
branch).Additional information
Checklist
current
branch.next
branch.Summary by CodeRabbit