Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update squeezebox.markdown Clarification of LMS server usage #37030

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

pssc
Copy link
Contributor

@pssc pssc commented Jan 21, 2025

Clarify the integration connects to an exiting instance and doesn't provide the LMS control directly itself as this has come up a couple of times in the HA LMS add-no thread.

Proposed change

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Squeezebox integration documentation to clarify connection to an existing LMS server and simplify the description of sensors.

Clarify the integration connects to an exiting instance and doesn't provide the LMS control directly itself as this has come up a couple of times in the HA LMS add-no thread.
@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 139d928
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/6790d68eb285fa0008df480a
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-37030--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a documentation update for the Squeezebox integration in Home Assistant. The change modifies the description of the integration's functionality, specifically clarifying how it connects to an existing LMS (Logitech Media Server) server and provides media players and sensors. The modification aims to provide a more precise explanation of the integration's capabilities and connection mechanism.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown Updated integration description to clarify connection to LMS server and sensor support

The key modification is in the descriptive text, shifting from:

  • Original: "provides both media players connected to the server and supporting binary sensors for the server status"
  • Updated: "connects to an existing LMS server and provides both media players and sensors for monitoring server status"

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cc9707 and 139d928.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a220d30 and 613097d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown (1)

Line range hint 1-24: Documentation structure and content are well-organized.

The documentation effectively communicates the integration's functionality, configuration, and usage. The clarification about connecting to an existing LMS server helps address the confusion mentioned in the PR objectives.

source/_integrations/squeezebox.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @pssc 👍

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 merged commit 7bd4ed0 into home-assistant:current Jan 23, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants