Bump blebox_uniapi to 2.2.1

[swistakm]

Proposed change

Update blebox_uniapi package version to 2.2.1 (latest). This version incorporates small improvements/fixes to collection of power measurement data of switchBox and switchBoxD devices. Also resolves problem logged regarding power measurements (see #103421).

I'm now official maintainer of blebox_uniapi (pinging @bbx-a and @riokuu to confirm) and will be working on this project for some longer time, so I have added myself to blebox component codeowners.

---

2.2.1

Changelog:

• fixed support for power measurement capabilities of switchBox and switchBoxD devices

Release: link
Diff: blebox/blebox_uniapi@v2.2.0...v2.2.1

---

2.2.2

Changelog:

• fixed wind reading units to get proper raw m/s value (division by 10, see PR fix: wind value is divided by 10 to get proper raw m/s value blebox/blebox_uniapi#150)

Release: link
Diff: blebox/blebox_uniapi@v2.2.1...v2.2.2

---

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes Lot of errors in logs with Blebox integration #103421
• This PR is related to issue: No power consumption reads for switchBox v3 blebox/blebox_uniapi#147 [request] Add power consumption for switchboxD device to HA integration blebox/blebox_uniapi#137
• Link to documentation pull request: n/a

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
• The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[home-assistant]

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

[home-assistant]

Hey there @bbx-a, @riokuu, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (blebox) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of blebox can trigger bot actions by commenting:

• @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
• @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
• @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
• @home-assistant unassign blebox Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
• @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
• @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

stale review: CLA errors fixed and CLA signed

[bbx-a]

Hey there @bbx-a, @riokuu, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (blebox) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

The changes look good!

Welcome to the new code owner @swistakm

Stale

[edenhaus]

Thanks for bumping the dependency! However, could you please update the PR description to contain at least one (or multiple) of the following:

• A link to the release notes of this package version, and all versions in between.
• A link to the changelog of this package.
• A link to a Git(Hub) diff/compare view from the current version to the bumped version.

This allows us to review upstream changes, which is needed to decide this change is working as intended and/or if we can include it in, for example, a patch release of Home Assistant.

Thanks already! 👍

[swistakm]

Hey @edenhaus. Sorry for delay. Was busy working on other issues over the week. In the meantime we have fixed another minor issue on the blebox_uniapi side and released another patch release. Here is summary of all the changes in chronological order:

---

2.2.1

Changelog:

• fixed support for power measurement capabilities of switchBox and switchBoxD devices

Release: link
Diff: blebox/blebox_uniapi@v2.2.0...v2.2.1

---

2.2.2

Changelog:

• fixed wind reading units to get proper raw m/s value (division by 10, see PR fix: wind value is divided by 10 to get proper raw m/s value blebox/blebox_uniapi#150)

Release: link
Diff: blebox/blebox_uniapi@v2.2.1...v2.2.2

---

We have another small fix to be merged soon (blebox/blebox_uniapi#153) but I think it would be better to update in smaller batches. WDYT?

Last but not least, if you by chance want to test evaluate changes locally but don't have any blebox device at hand: I've built a small simulator for selected devices. It is not complete but I plan to extend it over time. It supports zeroconf (but only on macOS) so homeassistant can discover all simulated devices. It makes much easier to evaluate backward compatibility of historical device variants.

[swistakm]

And the full changelog: https://github.com/blebox/blebox_uniapi/blob/master/HISTORY.rst

[swistakm]

@edenhaus I have just noticed that automation marked this PR as draft and I completely missed it.

[edenhaus]

Thanks @swistakm 👍
Can be merged if CI is passing

[edenhaus]

@edenhaus I have just noticed that automation marked this PR as draft and I completely missed it.

No need to ping me as the bot already requested a review from me, when you click "Ready for review"