VIH-10152 Audio recording required being changed to true on edit for Crime Crown Court and CACD #1263
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
komaldabhi1509
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
oliver-scott
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2023
…Crime Crown Court or CACD (#1263)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JIRA link (if applicable)
https://tools.hmcts.net/jira/browse/VIH-10152
Change description
Fixes an issue where the Audio Recording Required flag is changed from false to true when editing a booking with an interpreter for the Crime Crown Court or CACD case types. It should always be set to false for these case types.
The logic for whether this flag should be true or false lives in the frontend. However the backend duplicates this and overrides the value in the request if there are interpreters. This is not needed.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")