Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PackageChecksumRules #10

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

PackageChecksumRules #10

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

hlaueriksson
Copy link
Owner

@hlaueriksson hlaueriksson commented Dec 14, 2024

Implements #4

@neilenns
Copy link
Contributor

I took a quick peek, it looks reasonable. I pulled the branch locally and ran it against my DiscordTimestamp repo and it passed. Here's what it looked like in the debugger:

image

I suggest adding a note to the readme or something to go along with this rule that says a checksums.txt file can be generated in GitHub workflows using the wangzuo/action-release-checksums@v1 action (https://github.com/wangzuo/action-release-checksums) otherwise nobody will know about this.

@hlaueriksson
Copy link
Owner Author

Yes, the README should be updated.

@hlaueriksson
Copy link
Owner Author

@neilenns I updated the README. Does it make sense?

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@neilenns neilenns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a couple of readme suggestions.

hlaueriksson and others added 2 commits December 18, 2024 07:33
Co-authored-by: Neil Enns <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Neil Enns <[email protected]>
@hlaueriksson hlaueriksson merged commit 5738a6f into main Dec 18, 2024
1 check passed
@hlaueriksson hlaueriksson deleted the checksums branch January 12, 2025 21:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants