Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Buildpack failing instantly, suddenly? #749

Closed
ckcollab opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 10 comments · Fixed by #750
Closed

Buildpack failing instantly, suddenly? #749

ckcollab opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 10 comments · Fixed by #750

Comments

@ckcollab
Copy link

ckcollab commented Mar 30, 2020

-----> Node.js app detected
/app/tmp/buildpacks/.../bin/compile: line 26: 
/app/tmp/buildpacks/.../etc/vendor/stdlib_v7.sh: No such file or directory
 !     Push rejected, failed to compile Node.js app.
 !     Push failed

Getting this instantly on builds now, across multiple apps (don't think error is on my end)

@AugustMiller
Copy link

Just came to report the same thing—odd, granted the file still exists in the build pack, at this location!

We're blocked on deployments until this is resolved, although… there's an alternative syntax for specifying a version with a hash: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/buildpacks#buildpack-references

I'll post another comment if I can get this working. ✌️

@billyburgoa
Copy link

I am getting the same messages.

-----> Node.js app detected

/app/tmp/buildpacks/a104ebb80184ba556a3457859a381585c1c182694d8086bfcdabe39f3fe5857835812b209be5647b385deaddf7afa081b0f0c5d9d1683b767fb8abc0c3b79cc0/bin/compile: line 26: /app/tmp/buildpacks/a104ebb80184ba556a3457859a381585c1c182694d8086bfcdabe39f3fe5857835812b209be5647b385deaddf7afa081b0f0c5d9d1683b767fb8abc0c3b79cc0/etc/vendor/stdlib_v7.sh: No such file or directory

 !     Push rejected, failed to compile Node.js app.

 !     Push failed

@ozeas
Copy link

ozeas commented Mar 30, 2020

Same thing.


-----> Node.js app detected
/app/tmp/buildpacks/a104ebb80184ba556a3457859a381585c1c182694d8086bfcdabe39f3fe585783
5812b209be5647b385deaddf7afa081b0f0c5d9d1683b767fb8abc0c3b79cc0/bin/compile: line 26: 
/app/tmp/buildpacks/a104ebb80184ba556a3457859a381585c1c182694d8086bfcdabe39f3fe585783
5812b209be5647b385deaddf7afa081b0f0c5d9d1683b767fb8abc0c3b79cc0/etc/vendor/stdlib_v7.sh:
 No such file or directory

 !     Push rejected, failed to compile Node.js app.
 !     Push failed

@AugustMiller
Copy link

AugustMiller commented Mar 30, 2020

Temporary Fix to roll back to v167 release:

$ heroku buildpacks:set 'https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-nodejs#v167' --app your-app-name

(I am not a maintainer, and not sure if this is the recommended route, but it's gotten our app back online!)

@billyburgoa
Copy link

Temporary Fix to roll back to v167 release:

$ heroku buildpacks:set 'https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-nodejs#v167' --app your-app-name

(I am not an author, and not sure if this is the recommended route, but it's gotten our app back online!)

I don't know which version of my app is running in heroku. The mine is still running, though.

@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

I rolled back the buildpack, so this should be working again. The buildpack is using v167 by default now.

@ozeas
Copy link

ozeas commented Mar 30, 2020

Temporary Fix to roll back to v167 release:

$ heroku buildpacks:set 'https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-nodejs#v167' --app your-app-name

(I am not an author, and not sure if this is the recommended route, but it's gotten our app back online!)

it worked for me too.

@billyburgoa
Copy link

Things seem to be working fine again. I just deployed the branch and it got compiled without any issues.

@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

Going to close this since I rolled back. Please see my previous comment: #749 (comment)

@AugustMiller
Copy link

Thanks for the quick response! 💓

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants