Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for path completion #2608
Add support for path completion #2608
Changes from 8 commits
cc19db1
aaf7c20
ee5b319
be1e616
f20cd4c
d02470f
de75bde
59b2cf5
b08e6b6
a3e12ac
1334606
101bcc7
8af7c67
57e34aa
d4a873d
ce885df
3817321
d73f158
3dbcc4e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this needs to support cancellation or we risk a bunch of ghost tasks spinning in the background (can also be quite slow since sometimes completions can be requested quickly). Dropping a spawned task does not cancel the thread (that is nog really possible)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added an
Arc<AtomicBool>
for this which is polled.Alterntative would probably just be using tokio async functions, but as I said, it was significantly slower (probably around half the speed) than using everything in a blocking call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a bit ugly, what
dir_entry.path()
does is justdir_path.join(dir_entry.file_name())
so going trough all this to extractd the file name again doesn't seem ideal. Instead just extract the file name and use that here (and just dodir_path.join(file_name)
below)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be handled in the recent push.