Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebased cmake-staging branch (post PRs 33, 37) #38

Closed
wants to merge 38 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

hebasto
Copy link
Owner

@hebasto hebasto commented Oct 24, 2023

This is the cmake-staging branch rebased on the recent bitcoin/master one with the squashed "!fixup" commits.

Testing instructions are the same as for #31:


A note for reviewers:

First, the git rebase -i --autosquash master command was applied:
cmake-staging/pr38-init -- > cmake-staging/pr38-autosquash

Then, the recent changes in the build system in the master branch were applied:
cmake-staging/pr38-autosquash --> this PR branch

hebasto and others added 30 commits October 24, 2023 20:55
Co-authored-by: Cory Fields <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <[email protected]>
To configure CMake for cross-compiling, use
`--toolchain depends/${HOST}/share/toolchain.cmake` command-line option.
@hebasto
Copy link
Owner Author

hebasto commented Oct 24, 2023

Many thanks to @TheCharlatan who suggested to leverage the "fixup/autosquash" git functionality!

@hebasto
Copy link
Owner Author

hebasto commented Oct 24, 2023

Friendly ping @fanquake @theuni @TheCharlatan @luke-jr @willcl-ark @stickies-v @ajtowns @w0xlt @pablomartin4btc @vasild

The plan is to continue the work on #32 on top of this updated staging branch.

@theuni
Copy link

theuni commented Oct 25, 2023

For whatever reason, I had to move the "fixup! cmake: Add position independent code support" down to after the "add bitcoind" commit in order for the rebase to work. Maybe some config option difference for handling merge order or something?

After that, following along, the diff from this PR to what I generated with my rebase:

 $ git diff HEAD..hebasto/231024-linear
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index 6a5e9dcc66..10b484bebd 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.16...3.28)

 project("Bitcoin Core"
-  VERSION 25.99.0
+  VERSION 26.99.0
   DESCRIPTION "Bitcoin client software"
   HOMEPAGE_URL "https://bitcoincore.org/"
   LANGUAGES CXX ASM
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ endif()

 include(cmake/optional.cmake)

-find_package(Python3 3.8 COMPONENTS Interpreter)
+find_package(Python3 3.9 COMPONENTS Interpreter)
 set(PYTHON_COMMAND ${Python3_EXECUTABLE})

 add_subdirectory(src)
diff --git a/src/bench/CMakeLists.txt b/src/bench/CMakeLists.txt
index feec7290b1..3e9b144c77 100644
--- a/src/bench/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/src/bench/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ add_executable(bench_bitcoin
   checkqueue.cpp
   crypto_hash.cpp
   descriptors.cpp
+  disconnected_transactions.cpp
   duplicate_inputs.cpp
   ellswift.cpp
   examples.cpp

The version bump is obvious.
The python bump is from: bitcoin#28211
The additional cpp is from: bitcoin#28385

@theuni
Copy link

theuni commented Oct 25, 2023

-fstack-reuse=none is the other thing that I can think of that would need to be addressed in a recent buildsystem rebase, but those options come in #32.

LGTM. I'm curious if other reviewers have the same issue reproducing the rebase?

@vasild
Copy link

vasild commented Oct 26, 2023

LGTM

I got the same experience as in #38 (comment) and produced the same diff.

The change from commit 1246971 fixup! cmake: Add position independent code support is properly squashed in fc85336 cmake: Add position independent code support in this PR (branch 231024-linear), not like in my local rebase where I moved it into 6bf981a cmake: Build bitcoind executable to avoid a conflict.

@hebasto
Copy link
Owner Author

hebasto commented Oct 26, 2023

@theuni @vasild

Thank you for the reviewing!

This branch has been force pushed into the https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/tree/cmake-staging.

Closing.

@hebasto hebasto closed this Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants