Additional tweaks for EZQMS-1317

[mr1name]

Pull Request Requirements:

• Provide a brief description of the changeset.
• Include a screenshots if applicable
• Ensure that the changeset adheres to the DCO guidelines.

[huly-github-staging]

Connected to Huly®: UBERF-9330

[lexiv0re]

@mr1name could you add screenshots of how it looks for various cases:

1. only review
2. only approval
3. review + approval
4. review -> draft -> review
5. review -> draft -> review -> approval

[mr1name]

It's identical in all these cases just that each review or approval block now has a row with the author and the date (“signature”) of initiation.

[lexiv0re]

@mr1name I think what we wanted is a new standalone block so it'd look like

---

Approval
John

---

Review
Jack

---

Author
Jane

---

[mr1name]

@lexiv0re Why? These are foldable blocks that refer to a whole review or approval request. What's the point of making it a separate block? This would simply imply duplicating all blocks with the same meaning in the general case.

[lexiv0re]

@mr1name the point is to match the expectations where one would like to see three independent signatures for a document from:

1. Author
2. Reviewer
3. Approver

The idea is that the author signs the document itself, not a review/approval request. Theoretically, the author's signature could live on it's own w/o any reviews/approvals:

1. Author drafts a document and signs it. -> The signature is there but there's no review/approval yet.
2. He gives it to a reviewer/approver. -> Only at this point the review/approval process is started.

It's just in the system we combine the actions of signing by the author and sending to review/approval.

[lexiv0re]

At least that was my understanding. We can check with Charles to clarify this before proceeding in any direction.