Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TEST #1

Open
wants to merge 291 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

TEST #1

wants to merge 291 commits into from

Conversation

hazzlim
Copy link
Owner

@hazzlim hazzlim commented Aug 9, 2021

Summary of changes

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 9, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@4cfbea4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 0edb22b differs from pull request most recent head 3ed1c08. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3ed1c08 to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master       #1   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   63.29%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       84           
  Lines             ?    15353           
  Branches          ?     3872           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     9717           
  Misses            ?     3614           
  Partials          ?     2022           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 63.29% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4cfbea4...3ed1c08. Read the comment docs.

0xc0170 and others added 27 commits September 29, 2021 10:25
STM32: STM32_gen_PeripheralPins.py v1.20.4
LWIP: Provide inline replacements for htons() and htonl()
STM32 : default SPI and I2C for targets with ARDUINO-NANO
- Add SDK files (updated to match mbed system)
- Implement mbed API files
- Update mbed related configuration (CMakefiles, .json files...)
- Add gcc and arm related files (linker, scatter, startup...)
- Tested with ARM and GCC_ARM toolchain
- GreenTea tests have been executed

Signed-off-by: Sadik.Ozer <[email protected]>
…_0_master

Nanostack release v15.0.0 to master
STM32: enable STM32H735xG STM32H7B3xIQ for custom boards
STM32F3 - enable USB_DEVICE for NUCLEO_F303ZE
pin_names-arduino_uno test : UART test case update
STM32: introduce new wifi driver for B-U585I-IOT02A
mergify: fix issue with labels when PR is closed
hazzlim added 29 commits March 6, 2022 23:24
In file FlashIAP.h, the include preprocessor directive for flash_api.h
does not correctly qualify the full path (hal/flash_api.h). This results
in compilation failure. We correct this and allow successful compilation
when including FlashIAP.h.
When building OSPI for Unit Tests, the linker complains unless we
include <stddef.h> in ospi_api.h as the file uses size_t.
When building QSPI for Unit Tests, the linker complains unless we
include <stddef.h> in qspi_api.h as the file uses size_t.
In order to allow portability of the serial_api, we replace the
use of uint32_t with uintptr_t (type capable of holding a pointer),
which allows portability and expresses intentions more clearly.
In aid of this latter goal, we also replace the use of the name "id"
with "context", to improve clarity - these are addresses of the context
related to that callback.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.