Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v3.17.2 #984

Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 5, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) 3.17.1 -> 3.17.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v3.17.2

Fixed
  • It's now possible to pass a subclass of a field's type into #withPrefabValuesForField(). (Issue 1012)
Changed
  • The internal instantiation logic has been further refactored, to be more robust and extensible for future enhancements.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 89.729%. remained the same
when pulling 1ef7baa on renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.x
into bcf50fe on master.

@hazendaz hazendaz merged commit c6f5562 into master Nov 5, 2024
31 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.x branch November 5, 2024 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants