Even when we get an empty "status change" interrupt from the hub, schedule another interrupt poll #2016
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the PR
Even when we get an empty "status change" interrupt from a hub, schedule another interrupt poll.
During enumeration, when there are multiple devices attached to the hub as it's plugged into the Pi Pico, enumeration hangs, because we get a "status change" callback with value zero. With this patch, we retry several times on "zero" status change callbacks, until eventually we succeed.
Additional context
This is the cheapo hub that exhibits this behavior, but I assume it's not the only one: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B083RQMC7S.
While debugging this, I consulted the implementation in the Linux kernel. There, hub setup explicitly checks each port individually, before starting to depend on "status change" interrupts: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/usb/core/hub.c#L1133. We probably should do something like that here, but it's a much bigger change.