Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite to support IPv6 Link Local addresses #470

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

erwin-willems
Copy link
Contributor

@erwin-willems erwin-willems commented Oct 29, 2023

Proposed Changes

IPv6 Link Local Addresses (fe80) were skipped during the configuration of the interface binding. A use case could be to run your DNS server on address fe80::53 on all your networks. For this LLA should be supported.

For LLA binding, the interface name needs to be added to the binding. Like: fe80::53%enp1s0. I've rewritten the script to parse LLA with interface bindings.

This PR can be tested on my Dev repository:
https://github.com/erwin-willems/hassio-addons

Related Issues

#463 adguarhome add-on does not listen on ipv6 link-local address, and zerotier interface

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved IP address handling for both IPv4 and IPv6, ensuring more accurate and reliable network configurations.
    • Added support for binding to addon IP addresses and localhost IP addresses.

@erwin-willems

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@LordNex
Copy link

LordNex commented Nov 8, 2023

You might want to add the ability of which VLAN Interface you want it to listen on. I have a bug report out there now because I have a miltisubnetted network Main/IoT/Guest, that way all my IoT traffic doesn't interfere with my other device and such. Currently there is no standard way to define which interface it will pick as it's “default” interface. I'm running IPV6 on all my subnets as well. Not as important there but it still seem to cause issues from time to time. See 84113

@osh123

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@danielszilagyi

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@osh123

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for quite some time. label Feb 7, 2024
@snapsl
Copy link

snapsl commented Feb 7, 2024

Tested and it works.
Can this PR be merged so everyone can use this?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for quite some time. label Feb 8, 2024
@Amit-Shan

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for quite some time. label Apr 3, 2024
@jenschude

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@snapsl

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for quite some time. label Apr 9, 2024
@erwin-willems

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@jenschude

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@tjorim tjorim added the enhancement Enhancement of the code, not introducing new features. label Apr 17, 2024
@erwin-willems

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Amit-Shan

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for quite some time. label May 18, 2024
@Amit-Shan
Copy link

Not stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale There has not been activity on this issue or PR for quite some time. label May 19, 2024
@frenck
Copy link
Member

frenck commented May 24, 2024

@coderabbitai review

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The update to the init-adguard/run script focuses on refining IP address management. It now adeptly handles IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from interfaces, eliminates netmasks, and incorporates addon and localhost IP addresses for enhanced network functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
adguard/rootfs/.../init-adguard/run Updated IP address handling to manage IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, exclude netmasks, and add addon and localhost IPs.

🐇
In scripts where data flows so free,
New IPs dance with IPv4 and IPv6 glee,
Addon and localhost join the spree,
Binding together in harmony,
A network symphony, for all to see.
🌐✨

Tip

New Features and Improvements

Review Settings

Introduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments.

AST-based Instructions

CodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation.

Community-driven AST-based Rules

We are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information.

New Static Analysis Tools

We are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for biome, hadolint, and ast-grep. Update the settings in your .coderabbit.yaml file or head over to the settings page to enable or disable the tools you want to use.

Tone Settings

Users can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:

  • Mr. T: "You must talk like Mr. T in all your code reviews. I pity the fool who doesn't!"
  • Pirate: "Arr, matey! Ye must talk like a pirate in all yer code reviews. Yarrr!"
  • Snarky: "You must be snarky in all your code reviews. Snark, snark, snark!"

Revamped Settings Page

We have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to .coderabbit.yaml will be reflected in the settings page, and vice versa.

Miscellaneous

  • Turn off free summarization: You can switch off free summarization of PRs opened by users not on a paid plan using the enable_free_tier setting.
  • Knowledge-base scope: You can now set the scope of the knowledge base to either the repository (local) or the organization (global) level using the knowledge_base setting. In addition, you can specify Jira project keys and Linear team keys to limit the knowledge base scope for those integrations.
  • High-level summary placement: You can now customize the location of the high-level summary in the PR description using the high_level_summary_placeholder setting (default @coderabbitai summary).
  • Revamped request changes workflow: You can now configure CodeRabbit to auto-approve or request changes on PRs based on the review feedback using the request_changes_workflow setting.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
adguard/rootfs/etc/s6-overlay/s6-rc.d/init-adguard/run (1)

Line range hint 92-103: Updating the AdGuard Home configuration is handled well. Consider adding more detailed error messages for troubleshooting.

- bashio::exit.nok 'Failed updating AdGuardHome host'
+ bashio::exit.nok 'Failed updating AdGuardHome host with IP: ${host}'
Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbe5124 and b6dc2aa.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • adguard/rootfs/etc/s6-overlay/s6-rc.d/init-adguard/run (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
adguard/rootfs/etc/s6-overlay/s6-rc.d/init-adguard/run (2)

57-60: IPv4 address processing looks correct and efficient.


62-75: IPv6 address processing correctly handles link-local addresses as per the PR's objective.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6dc2aa and bea9fed.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • adguard/rootfs/etc/s6-overlay/s6-rc.d/init-adguard/run (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • adguard/rootfs/etc/s6-overlay/s6-rc.d/init-adguard/run

Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @erwin-willems 👍

../Frenck

@frenck frenck merged commit 591442f into hassio-addons:main May 24, 2024
11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Enhancement of the code, not introducing new features.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants