Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete duplicate cabal clause for applyrefact2 #654

Merged

Conversation

peterwicksstringfield
Copy link
Contributor

@peterwicksstringfield peterwicksstringfield commented Dec 8, 2020

The other copy of this clause is a few lines above the one I deleted.

@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Dec 8, 2020

wow, i didnt notice ApplyRefact2 was listed here, thanks for catching up
In fact i think we could remove all ocurrences, as hlint tests are using a direct hie.yaml and hls does not look in parent dirs.

This test uses a direct hie.yaml and this cabal file is not inspected, so this
clause does nothing.
@peterwicksstringfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think you are right. Also apparently ApplyRefact.hs doesn't exist anymore so we can lose that clause too.

test/testdata/HlintPragma.hs and test/testdata/FileWithWarning.hs are currently unused in the tests, so I guess those clauses are sort of useless too. All the HaRe stuff too.

@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Dec 8, 2020

test/testdata/HlintPragma.hs and test/testdata/FileWithWarning.hs are currently unused in the tests, so I guess those clauses are sort of useless too. All the HaRe stuff too.

yeah, please, clean them too if you dont mind make the pr larger

@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Dec 9, 2020

Well, let's move this forward, the full clean could be in another pr

@jneira jneira merged commit fc1ae15 into haskell:master Dec 9, 2020
@peterwicksstringfield peterwicksstringfield deleted the delete_duplicate_cabal_clause branch December 9, 2020 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants