-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 367
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove ignored paths #1623
Remove ignored paths #1623
Conversation
.github/workflows/bench.yml
Outdated
@@ -86,6 +90,8 @@ jobs: | |||
path: ~/.cabal/cabal.tar.gz | |||
|
|||
bench-example: | |||
needs: pre_job | |||
if: ${{ needs.pre_job.outputs.should_skip != 'true' }} | |||
needs: [bench-init] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to have two needs
keys? I thought yaml is just more elaborated json...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the case that bench-init
is skipped, is bench-example
still reachable if we don't add this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It will skip its computation but from the GitHub's point of view I think the jot itself is not skipped, and will execute following jobs...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even if the action lets you duplicate keys it is better to have only one, will change
EDIT: And it is not valid:
.github/workflows/bench.yml#L95
The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/bench.yml (Line: 95, Col: 5): 'needs' is already defined
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove duplicate needs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM :)
paths-ignore
doesnt work with required checks branch protection rules: https://github.community/t/path-filtering-on-required-pull-request-checks/18402/3skip-duplicate-actions
which was being already used can be used to get the same functionality: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/skip-duplicate-actions#option-1-skip-entire-jobs