-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't snip version conflicts #5892
Comments
The code in question is at cabal/cabal-install/Distribution/Solver/Modular/Package.hs Lines 57 to 67 in 28d7da0
|
See #6465 for another example of a truncated version. |
grayjay
added a commit
to grayjay/cabal
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2020
grayjay
added a commit
to grayjay/cabal
that referenced
this issue
Jan 5, 2020
4 tasks
phadej
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2020
Show full ABI hash for installed packages in solver log (fixes #5892).
grayjay
added a commit
to grayjay/cabal
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2020
grayjay
added a commit
to grayjay/cabal
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2020
…l#5892). This commit is the same as 96c3bf9, but with the unit tests updated to fix haskell#6495. The tests check less of the solver output so that they are less fragile.
phadej
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2020
Show full ABI hash for installed packages in solver log (fixes #5892).
phadej
pushed a commit
to phadej/cabal
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2020
…l#5892). This commit is the same as 96c3bf9, but with the unit tests updated to fix haskell#6495. The tests check less of the solver output so that they are less fragile.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It would be convenient for debugging a build failure if I could see all of the version information cabal knows about. Unfortunately it tends to do this:
What's after that
0.5...
?? :)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: