Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GitHub Action returntocorp/semgrep to v1.108.0 #6439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2025

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Feb 15, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
returntocorp/semgrep container minor 1.107.0 -> 1.108.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

semgrep/semgrep (returntocorp/semgrep)

v1.108.0

Compare Source

Added
  • pro: Semgrep can now dynamically resolve dependencies for Python projects using pip, allowing it to determine transitive dependencies automatically. (sc-2069)
Changed
  • Bump base Alpine docker image from 3.19 to 3.21. (alpine-version)
  • The semgrep-appsec-platform specific metadata fields "semgrep.dev:" and
    "semgrep.policy:" are now filtered from the JSON output unless you
    are logged in with the Semgrep appsec platform.
    See https://semgrep.dev/docs/semgrep-appsec-platform/json-and-sarif#json for more information. (metadata-filter)
  • The Semgrep Docker image now uses Python 3.12 (bumped from 3.11). (python-version)
Fixed
  • This PR changes the way we handle failures in git worktree remove more gracefully.
    Instead of erroring, we continue to scan so that the user can still get results, but
    log the error. It also adds a guard so that this failure is less likely to happen
    and will include more debugging information when it does. (sms-521)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 2am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge February 15, 2025 01:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Feb 15, 2025
@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9f068fd Feb 15, 2025
150 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/gha/returntocorp-semgrep-1.x branch February 15, 2025 02:11
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.41 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$65.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$52.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$56.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$48.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$98.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$86.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 507 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$81.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$72.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.698 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$177 \mathrm{ms} \pm 774 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.61 \mathrm{s} \pm 285 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.81 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.75 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.65 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.63 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant