Update npm package eslint to v9.20.1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
eslint (source)	devDependencies	patch	9.20.0 -> 9.20.1
eslint (source)	dependencies	patch	9.20.0 -> 9.20.1

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.20.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• 274f054 fix: fix RuleContext type (#​19417) (Francesco Trotta)

Documentation

• fe3ccb2 docs: allow typing in search box while dropdown is open (#​19424) (Amaresh S M)
• 93c78a5 docs: Add instructions for pnpm compat (#​19422) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
• b476a93 docs: Fix Keyboard Navigation for Search Results (#​19416) (Amaresh S M)
• ccb60c0 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.99%. Comparing base (035b26c) to head (0adcb6a).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6428      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.00%   20.99%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         583      583              
  Lines       20048    20058      +10     
  Branches     2992     2993       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         4212     4212              
- Misses      15779    15789      +10     
  Partials       57       57              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.30% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.14% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.89% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.00 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}19.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.35 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.27 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$64.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$37.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$52.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$98.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$86.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 610 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$88.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$81.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$73.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$82.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.783 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$268 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-95.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.69 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.124 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.03 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.55 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.38 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph