Update GitHub Action actions/create-github-app-token to 136412a

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
actions/create-github-app-token	action	digest	c1a2851 -> 136412a

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 2am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.03%. Comparing base (70aa0bb) to head (3fcf09b).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6306      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.21%   21.03%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         573      580       +7     
  Lines       19664    19831     +167     
  Branches     2872     2929      +57     
==========================================
  Hits         4171     4171              
- Misses      15441    15608     +167     
  Partials       52       52              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.34% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
apps.hash-api	1.14% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	48.69% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.91% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.84 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.05 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$85.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$81.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 621 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$72.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$88.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 651 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$97.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 437 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.362 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$36.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$51.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$174 \mathrm{ms} \pm 671 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.191 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$50.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.45 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}58.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$264 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.35 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.113 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.807 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}47.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.28 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph