Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of command: add destroy option to terraform apply help text into v1.3 #31715

Merged

Conversation

teamterraform
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #31714 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.3-backport.

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


Noticed this was missing when reviewing hashicorp/terraform-exec#292.

@teamterraform teamterraform requested a review from kmoe August 31, 2022 14:13
@teamterraform teamterraform force-pushed the backport/apply-destroy-apply-destroy/manually-honest-duckling branch from 524384f to f830e6e Compare August 31, 2022 14:13
@kmoe kmoe merged commit 6cb417e into v1.3 Sep 1, 2022
@kmoe kmoe deleted the backport/apply-destroy-apply-destroy/manually-honest-duckling branch September 1, 2022 16:09
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2022

Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2022

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 2, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants