Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added support for restoring default organization policies #1477

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 30, 2018
Merged

Added support for restoring default organization policies #1477

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
2ac78fc
Added support for restoring default organization policies
May 11, 2018
b49b6ec
Added support for restoring default folder/project organization policies
May 14, 2018
4722e12
Refactored code
May 15, 2018
deeaac5
Fixes #1239
May 24, 2018
0ee0f59
Clarify docs
danawillow May 30, 2018
11d5f19
Clarify docs
danawillow May 30, 2018
00e2b6c
Clarify docs
danawillow May 30, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 13 additions & 5 deletions google/resource_google_folder_organization_policy.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ func resourceGoogleFolderOrganizationPolicyRead(d *schema.ResourceData, meta int
d.Set("constraint", policy.Constraint)
d.Set("boolean_policy", flattenBooleanOrganizationPolicy(policy.BooleanPolicy))
d.Set("list_policy", flattenListOrganizationPolicy(policy.ListPolicy))
d.Set("restore_policy", flattenRestoreOrganizationPolicy(policy.RestoreDefault))
d.Set("version", policy.Version)
d.Set("etag", policy.Etag)
d.Set("update_time", policy.UpdateTime)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -85,18 +86,25 @@ func resourceGoogleFolderOrganizationPolicyDelete(d *schema.ResourceData, meta i
func setFolderOrganizationPolicy(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {
config := meta.(*Config)
folder := canonicalFolderId(d.Get("folder").(string))

listPolicy, err := expandListOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("list_policy").([]interface{}))
if err != nil {
return err
}

restoreDefault, err := expandRestoreOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("restore_policy").([]interface{}))
if err != nil {
return err
}

_, err = config.clientResourceManager.Folders.SetOrgPolicy(folder, &cloudresourcemanager.SetOrgPolicyRequest{
Policy: &cloudresourcemanager.OrgPolicy{
Constraint: canonicalOrgPolicyConstraint(d.Get("constraint").(string)),
BooleanPolicy: expandBooleanOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("boolean_policy").([]interface{})),
ListPolicy: listPolicy,
Version: int64(d.Get("version").(int)),
Etag: d.Get("etag").(string),
Constraint: canonicalOrgPolicyConstraint(d.Get("constraint").(string)),
BooleanPolicy: expandBooleanOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("boolean_policy").([]interface{})),
ListPolicy: listPolicy,
RestoreDefault: restoreDefault,
Version: int64(d.Get("version").(int)),
Etag: d.Get("etag").(string),
},
}).Do()

Expand Down
54 changes: 53 additions & 1 deletion google/resource_google_folder_organization_policy_test.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -129,6 +129,24 @@ func TestAccFolderOrganizationPolicy_list_update(t *testing.T) {
})
}

func TestAccFolderOrganizationPolicy_restore_defaultTrue(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()

folder := acctest.RandomWithPrefix("tf-test")
org := getTestOrgFromEnv(t)
resource.Test(t, resource.TestCase{
PreCheck: func() { testAccPreCheck(t) },
Providers: testAccProviders,
CheckDestroy: testAccCheckGoogleOrganizationPolicyDestroy,
Steps: []resource.TestStep{
{
Config: testAccFolderOrganizationPolicy_restore_defaultTrue(org, folder),
Check: getGoogleFolderOrganizationRestoreDefaultTrue("restore", &cloudresourcemanager.RestoreDefault{}),
},
},
})
}

func testAccCheckGoogleFolderOrganizationPolicyDestroy(s *terraform.State) error {
config := testAccProvider.Meta().(*Config)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -222,6 +240,22 @@ func testAccCheckGoogleFolderOrganizationListPolicyDeniedValues(n string, values
}
}

func getGoogleFolderOrganizationRestoreDefaultTrue(n string, policyDefault *cloudresourcemanager.RestoreDefault) resource.TestCheckFunc {
return func(s *terraform.State) error {

policy, err := getGoogleFolderOrganizationPolicyTestResource(s, n)
if err != nil {
return err
}

if !reflect.DeepEqual(policy.RestoreDefault, policyDefault) {
return fmt.Errorf("Expected the restore default '%s', instead denied, %s", policyDefault, policy.RestoreDefault)
}

return nil
}
}

func getGoogleFolderOrganizationPolicyTestResource(s *terraform.State, n string) (*cloudresourcemanager.OrgPolicy, error) {
rn := "google_folder_organization_policy." + n
rs, ok := s.RootModule().Resources[rn]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -249,7 +283,7 @@ resource "google_folder" "orgpolicy" {
}

resource "google_folder_organization_policy" "bool" {
# Test numeric folder ID.
# Test numeric folder ID.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can you revert the extra indents here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

folder = "${replace(google_folder.orgpolicy.name, "folders/", "")}"
constraint = "constraints/compute.disableSerialPortAccess"

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -322,3 +356,21 @@ resource "google_folder_organization_policy" "list" {
}
`, folder, "organizations/"+org)
}

func testAccFolderOrganizationPolicy_restore_defaultTrue(org, folder string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "google_folder" "orgpolicy" {
display_name = "%s"
parent = "%s"
}

resource "google_folder_organization_policy" "restore" {
folder = "${google_folder.orgpolicy.name}"
constraint = "serviceuser.services"

restore_policy {
default = true
}
}
`, folder, "organizations/"+org)
}
64 changes: 57 additions & 7 deletions google/resource_google_organization_policy.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ var schemaOrganizationPolicy = map[string]*schema.Schema{
Type: schema.TypeList,
Optional: true,
MaxItems: 1,
ConflictsWith: []string{"list_policy"},
ConflictsWith: []string{"list_policy", "restore_policy"},
Elem: &schema.Resource{
Schema: map[string]*schema.Schema{
"enforced": {
Expand All @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ var schemaOrganizationPolicy = map[string]*schema.Schema{
Type: schema.TypeList,
Optional: true,
MaxItems: 1,
ConflictsWith: []string{"boolean_policy"},
ConflictsWith: []string{"boolean_policy", "restore_policy"},
Elem: &schema.Resource{
Schema: map[string]*schema.Schema{
"allow": {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -99,6 +99,20 @@ var schemaOrganizationPolicy = map[string]*schema.Schema{
Type: schema.TypeString,
Computed: true,
},
"restore_policy": {
Type: schema.TypeList,
Optional: true,
MaxItems: 1,
ConflictsWith: []string{"boolean_policy", "list_policy"},
Elem: &schema.Resource{
Schema: map[string]*schema.Schema{
"default": {
Type: schema.TypeBool,
Required: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit confused about the structure of this. The API requires an empty object, so default is just a construct here- what made you decide to go for a nested object with a boolean that has to be set to true, instead of just top-leveling that boolean (i.e. restore_default = true)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only because in the requirements give me the next structure:
restore_policy {
default = true
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@morgante, this was your idea I believe. What do you think?

Copy link

@morgante morgante May 24, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason I specified it that way was for equivalence with the other constraint types, which use a nested structure. boolean_policy, for example, also only has a single boolean value but is also nested. Does that make sense?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it makes sense. It's a little different in this case because the others are mirroring the API exactly as it is, whereas this one is adding a field into an object, even though that field doesn't exist. I do think it's probably less confusing than just requiring an empty object though, and a bit more future proof anyway, so sure. I'm down.

},
},
},
},
}

func resourceGoogleOrganizationPolicy() *schema.Resource {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -152,6 +166,7 @@ func resourceGoogleOrganizationPolicyRead(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface
d.Set("version", policy.Version)
d.Set("etag", policy.Etag)
d.Set("update_time", policy.UpdateTime)
d.Set("restore_policy", flattenRestoreOrganizationPolicy(policy.RestoreDefault))

return nil
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -200,13 +215,19 @@ func setOrganizationPolicy(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {
return err
}

restoreDefault, err := expandRestoreOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("restore_policy").([]interface{}))
if err != nil {
return err
}

_, err = config.clientResourceManager.Organizations.SetOrgPolicy(org, &cloudresourcemanager.SetOrgPolicyRequest{
Policy: &cloudresourcemanager.OrgPolicy{
Constraint: canonicalOrgPolicyConstraint(d.Get("constraint").(string)),
BooleanPolicy: expandBooleanOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("boolean_policy").([]interface{})),
ListPolicy: listPolicy,
Version: int64(d.Get("version").(int)),
Etag: d.Get("etag").(string),
Constraint: canonicalOrgPolicyConstraint(d.Get("constraint").(string)),
BooleanPolicy: expandBooleanOrganizationPolicy(d.Get("boolean_policy").([]interface{})),
ListPolicy: listPolicy,
RestoreDefault: restoreDefault,
Version: int64(d.Get("version").(int)),
Etag: d.Get("etag").(string),
},
}).Do()

Expand All @@ -227,6 +248,20 @@ func flattenBooleanOrganizationPolicy(policy *cloudresourcemanager.BooleanPolicy
return bPolicies
}

func flattenRestoreOrganizationPolicy(restore_policy *cloudresourcemanager.RestoreDefault) []map[string]interface{} {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: camelcase

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed

rp := make([]map[string]interface{}, 0, 1)

if restore_policy == nil {
return rp
}

rp = append(rp, map[string]interface{}{
"default": true,
})

return rp
}

func expandBooleanOrganizationPolicy(configured []interface{}) *cloudresourcemanager.BooleanPolicy {
if len(configured) == 0 {
return nil
Expand All @@ -238,6 +273,21 @@ func expandBooleanOrganizationPolicy(configured []interface{}) *cloudresourceman
}
}

func expandRestoreOrganizationPolicy(configured []interface{}) (*cloudresourcemanager.RestoreDefault, error) {
if len(configured) == 0 {
return nil, nil
}

restoreDefaultMap := configured[0].(map[string]interface{})
default_value := restoreDefaultMap["default"].(bool)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: camelcase

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed


if default_value {
return &cloudresourcemanager.RestoreDefault{}, nil
}

return nil, fmt.Errorf("Invalid value for restore_policy. Expecting default = true")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of this, what do you think about adding a ValidateFunc to the field? That way, if someone sets the default to false, it would get caught at plan-time instead of apply-time.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added ValidateFunc

}

func flattenListOrganizationPolicy(policy *cloudresourcemanager.ListPolicy) []map[string]interface{} {
lPolicies := make([]map[string]interface{}, 0, 1)

Expand Down
Loading