Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: support rolling updates for google instance group manager. #51

Closed
hashibot opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 15 comments
Closed

Comments

@hashibot
Copy link

This issue was originally opened by @qvallance-ctc as hashicorp/terraform#10647. It was migrated here as part of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.


Google has added functionality for performing rolling updates for managed instance groups.
https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instance-groups/updating-managed-instance-groups

Would like Terraform's google_compute_instance_group_manager to support rolling updates as an update policy.

(Functionality is currently in Alpha - opening request to track progress for when it goes GA)

InstanceGroupManagerUpdatePolicy (v0.alpha)
https://code.googlesource.com/google-api-go-client/+/master/compute/v0.alpha/compute-gen.go#7175
https://code.googlesource.com/google-api-go-client/+/master/compute/v0.alpha/compute-api.json#4339

@rileykarson
Copy link
Collaborator

Linking to the general alpha/beta issue: #93

@danielcompton
Copy link
Contributor

One thing that could be useful to have (maybe in a separate PR, but thought I'd mention it here), is the ability to keep the last n instance group templates around. This would mean you could do things like canary deploys, or rollback to previous templates with the instance group updater.

@domdoescode
Copy link

Giving this a bump as it's now in beta (as instructed here) =)

@rosbo rosbo removed their assignment Oct 11, 2017
@zbikmarc
Copy link
Contributor

zbikmarc commented Dec 6, 2017

Any chances to have it done in near future?

@shaharmor
Copy link

I would be happy to see this as well

@amarlot
Copy link

amarlot commented Dec 13, 2017

Confirmed. It would be great to support rolling update.

@seanmalloy
Copy link

@danawillow this would be a very nice feature to have. I sent you brief email with some additional details.

@danawillow
Copy link
Contributor

@paddycarver looks like this is assigned to you. Have you started thinking about this? Also @ishashchuk it looks like you might be doing some work around this. If you are could you claim the issue here so we don't end up duplicating work? Thanks!

@paddycarver
Copy link
Contributor

I've investigated this and it's on my short list. I'll either have an update on 3/1 or will unassign myself from the issue at that time to free it up for someone else to nab. Sorry for the slowness on my end. :(

@ishashchuk
Copy link
Contributor

@danawillow I already have something working for instance group manager and am planning to create a PR shortly. Once I get some feedback around my approach, my plan is to implement it for regional instance group manager in a separate request.

@amoiseiev
Copy link

@danawillow @paddycarver hey guys, we should have claimed this item earlier, it's on our high priority list, sorry for this. As @ishashchuk mentioned above, we're committed to get this implemented for main components of the rolling updates for IGMs and rIGMs. It won't include "canary updates" on its first iteration but should implement basic rolling updates that will cover, in our opinion, most use cases for general public. We're also ready to get any changes requested in the review process implemented in a timely manner, just need the reviews from your team :)

@paddycarver paddycarver removed their assignment Mar 1, 2018
@paddycarver
Copy link
Contributor

Cool! I'm going to unassign myself (sorry for the failure to communicate on my part!) just for clarity.

I'd be happy to review any PR you want to send our way, and am super grateful you're willing to take on the work and are open to feedback!

@paddycarver
Copy link
Contributor

Oops, I just saw #1137, I'll review that ASAP. Very excited for this!

@paddycarver
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like #1137 has been merged, thanks @ndmckinley! Closing this out.

luis-silva pushed a commit to luis-silva/terraform-provider-google that referenced this issue May 21, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests