-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_site_recovery_replicated_vm - support 'target_availability_zone' argument #15617
Conversation
…very support for VM using azurerm_site_recovery_replicated_vm
For issue #14652 |
internal/services/recoveryservices/site_recovery_replicated_vm_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/recoveryservices/site_recovery_replicated_vm_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Yichun Ma <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @cheng514
Thanks for this PR.
Taking a look through whilst this is off to a good start, we're making Zones consistent across the Provider in 3.0 (more details can be found in #14588) - as such we'll need to bring this into line with those changes (and add some tests) - but if we can fix those up then this should otherwise be good to go 👍
Thanks!
internal/services/recoveryservices/site_recovery_replicated_vm_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/recoveryservices/site_recovery_replicated_vm_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Tom Harvey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tom Harvey <[email protected]>
Hi @tombuildsstuff , thank you so much for your review. I have made changes accordingly and added tests. Please review again and let me know if there are any other issues. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CI needs to be fixed up @myc2h6o
internal/services/recoveryservices/site_recovery_replicated_vm_resource.go
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi @tombuildsstuff and @katbyte, hope you are well, and thank you for your help reviewing this PR. I see that this PR has been moved to the v3.0.0 milestone. As we are expecting to use this feature soon for our workloads, and our modules are not ready for the v3.0.0 major release, I'm wondering if there are any more minor versions that might be released before v3.0.0? If possible, could we please add this feature into one of the v2 minor releases? Much appreciated! |
internal/services/recoveryservices/site_recovery_replicated_vm_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🦀
This functionality has been released in v3.0.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you! |
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Added 'target_availability_zone' argument for zone-zone diaster recovery support for VM using azurerm_site_recovery_replicated_vm.
(fixes #14652)