Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix API panic and bad missing port check #2336

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2017
Merged

Fix API panic and bad missing port check #2336

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2017

Conversation

schmichael
Copy link
Member

The format of the missing port error message changed from Go 1.7 to 1.8.
The fix is to just use strings.Contains instead of strings.HasPrefix
when looking for the "missing port" part: golang/go@866e014#diff-ae34eb42831ffecf011ea43c6429582c

Also add an error return to Client.newRequest as parsing the path
processes arbitrary user input and would panic if given an invalid URL.

See: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/nomad-tool/gi3-CTE7oXo/discussion

The format of the missing port error message changed from Go 1.7 to 1.8.
The fix is to just use strings.Contains instead of strings.HasPrefix
when looking for the "missing port" part.

Also add an error return to Client.newRequest as parsing the path
processes arbitrary user input and would panic if given an invalid URL.

See: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/nomad-tool/gi3-CTE7oXo/discussion
@dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

dadgar commented Feb 20, 2017

LGTM

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2023

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 5, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants