Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

task health check to kill & replace #164

Closed
ProbablyRusty opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 10 comments
Closed

task health check to kill & replace #164

ProbablyRusty opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@ProbablyRusty
Copy link

It would be great to be able to register a task health check in a job definition (a la Consul) that, optionally, could be leveraged by Nomad to kill and replace a failed task.

@cbednarski
Copy link
Contributor

This will be included in our consul integration (probably in 0.2).

@c4milo
Copy link
Contributor

c4milo commented Feb 1, 2016

This would be really nice to have. Are there any updates @cbednarski?

@abhidrona
Copy link

@cbednarski is this already implemented?

@dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

dadgar commented Jun 22, 2016

@abhidrona No it is not! Nomad will register services and checks but does not use the state of the checks to restart tasks.

@stongo
Copy link

stongo commented Oct 13, 2016

I'm not sure what the priority is for this, but IMHO it should be of highest priority.
Using service health checks but no task health checks, Nomad creates a zombie fleet of tasks.
What exactly is the point of having unhealthy jobs non-discoverable but still running?

@memelet
Copy link

memelet commented May 23, 2017

This also is one of the very few issues that keep us from switching over from mesos to nomad. (We run nomad in our staging environment, but can't afford to manually restart tasks in production.)

@dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

dadgar commented Jun 23, 2017

Closing in favor of #876 given more people have seen that one.

@dadgar dadgar closed this as completed Jun 23, 2017
@c4milo
Copy link
Contributor

c4milo commented Jun 23, 2017

@dadgar this is #164

@dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

dadgar commented Jun 23, 2017

Fixed reference! My bad!

notnoop pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2020
[0.10.3] - Magic Byte DOS CVE Protection
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 12, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants